Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Timeline (RDM)/Archive5: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Timeline (RDM)/Archive5
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Joe Beaudoin Jr. in topic Real-world events within the timeline?
Hunter2005 (talk | contribs)
m →‎Unfinished Business: re-signed. For some reason it disappeared between editings.
Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "Primusphoto.jpg" to "Youngadamafamily.jpg"
 
(155 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Caprica Boomer's conception and morning sickness ==
{{archive-header
| archivenumber = 1
| number = 1
| start = July 28th, 2005
| end = November 31st, 2005
| items =  {{archive-item|1|Caprica Boomer's conception and morning sickness}} {{archive-item|1|Home II}} {{archive-item|1|Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons}} {{archive-item|1|Untangling Season 2|end=y}}
|}}


Only twelve days between Caprica Boomer's conception and morning sickness? That put's it at the fourth week, which is pretty much before she notices she is late.  Sounds like a possible plot hole.  Perhaps the caprica segments were not at the same time as the main fleet episodes or Cylon physilology makes them super sensitive to morning sickness. --[[User:Shemnon|Shemnon]] 18:35, 28 Jul 2005 (EDT)
{{archive-header
| archivenumber = 2
| number = 2
| start = January 7th, 2006
| end = March 22nd, 2006
| items =  {{archive-item|2|6 months?}} {{archive-item|2|Duration of Home, Part I}} {{archive-item|2|Roslin's life expectancy after "Epiphanies"}} {{archive-item|2|When is the Presidential Election?}} {{archive-item|2|Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes}} {{archive-item|2|The Ten Weeks thing in "Downloaded"}} {{archive-item|2|Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note}} {{archive-item|2|Fine Tuning "Black Market" Through "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I"|end=y}}
|}}


:In fact, the times used here are taken from the captions introducing the Caprica sections in each episode, so a discrepancy is not possible. I too find the interval implausibly short, but that's just how it is, I guess. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:18, 29 Jul 2005 (EDT)
{{archive-header
| archivenumber = 3
| number = 3
| start = March 22nd, 2006
| end = November 19th, 2006
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|3|Days v. Day}} {{archive-item|3|Dating "The Captain's Hand"}} {{archive-item|3|Future Events}} {{archive-item|3|"Circa:" the enemy of all anal historians|end=y}}
|}}


== Home II ==
{{archive-header
:Roslin might not live to see Earth; although I don't have a recording of the episode, I thought she just said that she would "lead" them to Earth before her death. And since Roslin was responsible for finding the path to Earth (the starmaps in the Tomb of Athena) it might be argued that she's already 'led' them on the right path to Earth...[[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 17:56, 27 August 2005 (EDT)
| archivenumber = 4
| number = 4
| start = November 19th, 2006
| end = February 27th, 2007
| items =  {{archive-item|3|Timeline Image}} {{archive-item|4|the Colonial calender}} {{archive-item|4|The Hero Continuity Discrepency}} {{archive-item|4|Unfinished Business}} {{archive-item|4|Justification of the change of the timeline}} {{archive-item|4|Episode timeline slight adjustment}} {{archive-item|4|Major Cleanup Needed}} {{archive-item|4| I propose to shift "Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I & II" over about 10 days.}} {{archive-item|4|Another Colonial Date in "Precipice"}} {{archive-item|4|Split Idea}} {{archive-item|4| Ancient history|end=y}}
|}}


Re: Home, Part II: I realize that it's been difficult to firmly establish dates during this season, and anticipate that it will only get worse now that the main Kobol's Last Gleaming – Home arc is complete and the story resumes a more episodic feel. As a result, it would be helpful to justify any timeline estimates on the relevant episode's Notes section, as I have done for [[Resistance]] and [[The Farm]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:13, 27 August 2005 (EDT)
== Adama meeting Saul ==


== Saul and Bill vs. The ''Evil'' Cylons ==
Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they've known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn't it be 30? {{unsigned|Zethon}}
:[[Battlestar Wiki:Official Communiques#Adama/Tigh Meeting|According to Bradley Thompson]] he is exaggerating, and it's closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
::Definitely note it. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
:::[{{fullurl:Timeline (RDM)|diff=127013&oldid=118059}} Already did so] :) --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)


So wait... The Cylon War started when William Adama was, roughly, ten and Saul Tigh was being born? It then went on for about 10 years, thus ending shortly after Adama would have been able to be in the military (assuming both that he wouldn't lie about his age to get in and that the Colonial Fleet has similar age-restrictions to the US Army--both pure speculation) and when Tigh was 10ish. This is my understanding from reading the time-line. I've frankly not paid much attention to when they mention these things on-screen. However, if this is true, then how did the ten-year-old Tigh learn about Cylon boarding party tactics after the Armistice? I have the (perhaps mistaken) impression that both Tigh and Adama are veterans of the Cylon War, but this timeline doesn't seem to allow for that. What's going on here? Am I daft? This is entirely possible. --[[User:Day|Day]] 04:03, 10 September 2005 (EDT)
=="Hero" Timeline Issues, revisited==
The alterations to the established timeline made in "[[Hero]]" continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of [[Galen Tyrol]] and [[Felix Gaeta]]'s articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.


== Untangling Season 2 ==
'''To review:'''
All materials prior to "[[Hero]]", as well as [[Sources:Adama's Dossier|Adama's Dossier]] from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on ''Galactica'' for several years:
*Gaeta: "And may I also take this opportunity to say it's been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years." ([[Miniseries]])
*Tyrol: "Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I'd like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you've served as commanding officer of this ship." ([[Miniseries]])
*Adama: "Chief Tyrol's been under my command for over five years" ([[Litmus]])


After their meticulous efforts at keeping track of the timeline during the first season, [[TPTB]] have apparently started slacking off this season. A clear timeline is an important resource, however, so let's start untangling things.
No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than ''Galactica''. In fact, when listing the ships he's served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention ''Valkyrie'':
*Tyrol: I've served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia,  Atlantia, Galactica-- ([[Resistance]]).


*'''Scattered''', '''Valley of Darkness''' and '''Fragged''' all clearly take place within the same 24-36 hours, on Day 51.
In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.


*'''Resistance''' takes place over two days, and begins on day 53 ''at the earliest''. Apollo asks Dualla how his father is doing "today", implying that it is at least the second time he has done so. His first chance would have been the morning of Day 52, putting the earliest possible date of this episode at Day 53.
The timeline provided by [[Sources:Adama's Dossier|Adama's Dossier]] fits very well with the information above, placing his service on ''Valkyrie'' from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on ''Galactica'', and enough time that Tyol's comment about the "many years you've served as commanding officer of this ship" makes sense.


:*Begins: Day 53
Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from "Hero" into account:
:*Ends: Day 54 (earliest possible)
*Adama: "That's right. He's one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured."
*Novacek: "Well, sir, it's like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years."
*Roslin: "About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?"
*Thrace: "Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]"


:At the end of the episode, Roslin escapes and Bill Adama wakes up. In "The Farm", Gaeta states that Roslin's escape took place "last week". This is very vague, and means only that "The Farm" begins more than one day after "Resistance", or else Gaeta would have said "yesterday". In a [http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/episodes/season02/205/deleted2.html scene] cut from beginning of The Farm (during Roslin's arrival on ''[[Kimba Huta]]''), Roslin makes a stronger statement - that it's been an "entire week" since her escape from ''Galactica''. This allows us to constrain the date of this episode fairly well, by substracting a seven day period from the well established possible date range for The Farm:
All this indicates that Adama was transferred to ''Galactica'' on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on ''Valkyrie'' and transferred with him to ''Galactica'', and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol's statement from the Miniseries about Adama's lengthy command of ''Galactica''.


:*Ends Day 55 (latest, if Tigh were in command for 11 days (the longest probable time period))
My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from "Hero", and put Bulldog's aborted mission at -6 BCH - "three years ago" should be changed to "eight years ago", and "about a year prior to the Cylon attack" should be changed to "about six years prior...". Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.
:*Ends Day 57 (latest, if Tigh were in command for 13 days (the longest possible time period))


:I thus consider Days 53-54 to be most likely range. This assumption is important, as "Flight of the Phoenix" must be calculated based on the day of Cally's arrest.  
The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol's backstory with Adama's, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)


*'''The Farm''' begins with Adama resuming command. According to D'Anna Biers in "Final Cut", Tigh was in command for "over a week". I take this to mean 8-11 days, since if it had been 12 or more, she probably would have said "almost two weeks". That puts the beginning of this episode at day 59 (earliest) or day 62 (latest).
:I couldn't agree more. ''Finally'' someone points that out. Usually I don't take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on ''Galactica'' for a few years. Not just Tyrol's very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. "Hero" messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol ('''and''' Gaeta!) followed him from ''Valkyrie'' to ''Galactica'' just complicates things unnecessarily. It's beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
::It's clearly a mistake by the writers, but I'm skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just "teach the controversy", adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that [[Adama's Dossier]], with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just [[Battlestar_Wiki:Official_Communiques/Archive8#Battlestar_Night_Flight.2F.28Era.29smus|produced quickly by the art department]], without significant guidance from the executive producers.[[User:OTW|OTW]] 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
::Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to "teaching the controversy", as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. "Hero" is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can't ignore by simply "throwing out the dialogue", which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
:::I'd normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I'm loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:
:::*In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.
:::*The early version is integral to Tyrol's backstory and can't be reconciled with the later version.
:::*As a "one-off" not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of "Hero" will be referenced again.
:::In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in [[Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity]], "Act of Contrition" and "The Farm") consensus the "official" version, and footnoting the "Hero" version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
::::That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to [[Hero]] we use the "Hero version", footnoting the "official version" and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn't entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn't need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
::::It's infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to ''Galactica''. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it's not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on ''Galactica'' for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don't understand this rule that there can't possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn't the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it's taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...
::::As for the "[[Hero]]" page. We can leave the "three years" in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use "eight years" with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::The pages [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Valkyrie]], [[Stealthstar]], [[Corman]] and [[Armistice Line]] currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the 'hero timeline' as their information is almost entirely derived from ''Hero''. The question is, do articles such as [[William Adama]] assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred '''before'''' humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn't happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: "There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see [[Hero timeline discontinuity]]" or similar notes where relevant ''in the main text'' to make it clear. [[User:OTW|OTW]] 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
::::::I don't see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in "Hero" in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the "three years" in the main text, we'd need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The ''Valkyrie'' page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.
::::::Moreover, moving "Hero" a few years earlier actually gives Adama's doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
::::::This sounds good to me, OTW. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::::Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn't happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW's idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)


:*Begins: Day 59 (earliest) (Kobol's Last Gleaming Part I (Day 51) + 8 days)
=== Vote ===
:*Begins: Day 62 (latest probable) (+11 days)
:*Begins: Day 64 (latest possible) (+13 days)


:Roslin, as noted above, clarifies further in a cut scene, implying that this episode takes place exactly seven days after "Resistance". Working off of my estimate above, I therefore suggest that the most probable start date for this episode is Day 61, which puts Tigh in command for a 10 day period.
Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is ''what'' to write, the other is ''how''. So vote on 1 or 2 '''and''' a or b.


:This also means that Adama spent seven days between resuming consciousness and resuming command. Given the extent of his injuries, this is entirely plausible.
==== Option 1 ====


*'''Home, Part I''' begins immediately after the end of "The Farm".
Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.


*'''Final Cut''' takes place 10 days after the last Cylon contact. Since there were none since Valley of Darkness (Day 51), unless we count the Roslin Faction's skirmish on Kobol, and the episode clearly takes place much later than day 61, we must assume there has been a Cylon contact at some point ''after'' "Home, Part II", and that it's been more than ten days since then.
==== Option 2 ====


*'''Flight of the Phoenix''' features Cally's release from the brig. Since Bill Adama was being lenient when he sentenced her (in The Farm, some time after she would've been initially imprisoned), we may assume he granted her time served. If she killed Boomer on the evening of day 54, her first day in the brig would have been completed on the evening of day 55, her 30th on the evening of day 84. Her welcome-back party was probably that very night.
Change the dates (except in the "[[Hero]]" summary) on pages like this one, [[William Adama]], [[Daniel Novacek]], [[Stealthstar]] and [[Valkyrie]] to 6BCH/"eight years ago" as per the dossier '''and''' earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering "Hero" dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.
:*Begins: Day 84 (earliest, if "Resistance" ended on day 54)
:*Begins: Day 87 (latest possible, if Tigh was in command for 13 days, and thus Resistance ended on Day 57)
:As per "Resistance", we assume Day 84 here.


:The duration of the episode is difficult to determine. We can probably put an upper limit on it based on the progress of Roslin's disease in the following episodes, but in his podcast, RDM notes that the timeline was kept deliberately vague for dramatic purposes:
*{{support}} As said, I don't think it's in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it's clearly wrong. We don't just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
:<blockquote>The true timeline of how long it would really take Tyrol to actually build one of these things from scratch would probably be much - it would be weeks, realistically. But you'd rather tell the story in one package. You'd rather tell the story, hold the viewer in the moment of the scene, make them invest themselves in the effort and pay it off. And so you can fudge the timeline, you can kind of skate by it. There's no definitive statement in the episode of how long this is all taking. It's kept purposely vague. It's not - there's no, like, y'know, clock going on. No one's mentioning a passage of time really since he started working on the viper. You could probably find cryptic references here and there that might nail it down to a specific timeline - ''maybe''.</blockquote>
*{{support}} Serenity said it all, don't have anything to add here but that I agree. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
:*Although interpreting Moore's comments may not be wise, his notion that the Blackbird would take at least "weeks" to complete is probably plausible. Thus we can guess that the episode ends at ''the earliest'' 14 days later.
*{{support}} Just because the show is inconsistent doesn't mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don't think it's misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says "A", a set of pages that says "not A", and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say "A" (or "not A") and then note the particular places that didn't jive. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
:*Ends: Day 98 (if "Resistance" ended on day 54)
*{{support}} I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
:*Ends: Day 99 (if Tigh was in command for 11 days, and thus Resistance ended on Day 55)
:*Ends: Day 101 (if Tigh was in command for 13 days, and thus Resistance ended on Day 57)
:An upper limit on the end date of this episode is provided by the start of "Pegasus". When more information is available we will probably want to expand the date range as generously as possible, given the lengthy construction task in depicts.


*'''Pegasus''' is very difficult to date because of the trouble with the duration of "Flight of the Phoenix". All that can be said for certain is that, since Roslin is still on her feet, it can't ''possibly'' be more than 30 days after that episode begins, and ''probably'' no more than 20. Conceivably, "Pegasus" could have begun the very day "Flight of the Phoenix" ended, with the christening ceremony and Roslin's appearance on Galactica bookmarking the same visit. Otherwise, there were probably several days or more between her visits.
==== Option a ====
**This is a slightly difficult reading, if only because of Adama's line "Well, Madam President, you picked a hell of a day for a visit" - she didn't pick the day for her visit in "Flight of the Phoenix", the deck crew did.


*'''Resurrection Ship, Part I''' is explicitly stated to take place six months after the fall of the twelve colonies. This badly contradicts earlier information, and there is no plausible place to insert the missing two month period, since Roslin's prognosis is updated before Cally is released from the brig in "Flight of the Phoenix". The episode itself does not appear to span more than a day.
Create an own page similar to [[Season two timeline discontinuity]] which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.


*'''Resurrection Ship, Part II''' resumes immediately from the end of Part I, and appears to span about two and a half days.
==== Option b ====
:In the episode "Epiphanies", which begins on day 189, Gaius Baltar notes that it has been "weeks" since he last saw his internal six. That puts her last appearance in this episode no later than day 175.


*'''Epiphanies''' should take place very near the end of the life span projected for Roslin in "Flight of the Phoenix". Hopefully more information will be available to date later episodes from that point, but if not, it's probably the last episode that will be dateable with any degree of certainty. For now, we can state that ''at the latest'', the episode ''begins'':
Put a section at the beginning of [[Hero#Analysis]] which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes
:*Begins: Day 114 (if "Resistance" ended on day 54)
:*Begins: Day 115 (if Tigh was in command for 11 days, and thus Resistance ended on Day 55)
:*Begins: Day 117 (if Tigh was in command for 13 days, and thus Resistance ended on Day 57)
:However, it now appears that Cain's "six month" statement will be adhered to in future episodes. [http://galactica.emedian.net/episode/2.13/imagepages/image13.html Promotional photographs] from the episode indicate that Boomer is showing visibly, which is more consistant with a five-month pregnancy than the three-month pregnancy accounted for above. (Boomer was impregnated between Day 24 and Day 36 in the first season.)
::Unless you go with the "Cylons have accelerated pregnancies" argument, which is admittedly something of a cop-out. --[[User:Redwall|Redwall]] 20:09, 14 January 2006 (EST)
:The episode explicitly states that it takes place on Day 189 post-holocaust. The missing two months cannot be accounted for, and must be written off as a continuity error.


*In '''Black Market''', Fisk's assasination takes place "a matter of weeks" after Cain's. Phelan is killed two days later. Apollo's debriefing probably takes place the next day after that.
*{{support}} I think this is the easiest solution. I'm against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
*{{support}} Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --[[User:Talos|Talos]] 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
*{{support}} Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
**{{comment}} I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the "Hero" page). I'd create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like "While "Hero" places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see..." --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
*{{support}} Since this discontinuity isn't as big and doesn't span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn't have to be in its own article. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)


*Scar opens on Majahual's 29th day of mining operations. During this time period, the fleet has split up so that ''Galactica'' may guard mining operations while ''Pegasus'' shepherds the fleet and provides a less static target. The big question here is, could "Black Market" have taken place during this 29-day span?
**Evidence in favor: The distance from Admiral Adama's oversight would hvae afforded Jack Fisk ample opportunity to become embroiled with the Black Market.
**Evidence against: Both ''Pegasus'' and ''Galactica'' are both seen with the Fleet at the beginning of "Black Market". This means that either the fleet had yet to split up, ''Majahual'' had returned to the Fleet with ''Galactica'', or that ''Majahual'' had been left behind in the asteroid field, defenseless.
***Counterpoint: It may have been necessary for the mining ships involved in the project to offload ore at refinery ship ''Daru Mozu'' before returning to mining activities. In this case, ''Galactica'' could have been escorting a mining ship back to the fleet during "Black Market".
**Evidence against: In the midst of Scar's attacks during the mining operation, Lee Adama would have been a poor choice to lead the investigation into Fisk's murder, since his skills as CAG were in greater demand with the Viper squadrons.
:So, could "Epiphanies" have as well?
:*Evidence in favor: Thrace spends most of her time in "Epiphanies" onboard ''Galactica''. The mining operations give her an excuse to be on ''Galactica'' despite her nominal position as CAG of ''Pegasus''.
:*Evidence against: Roslin spent what were very nearly her last days in ''Galactica'''s infirmary. If ''Galactica'' had been in a combat situation at the time, this would not have been a good choice.


*Not much information is available to pin down the date of '''Sacrifice'''.
== "Scattered" re-re-re-visted ==


*'''The Captain's Hand''' gives us two clues as to its date:
Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we're now taking the dossier at face value, I've tried to change all dates to it. In  general it fits, but it places Adama's reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to ''Atlantia'' at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can't place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on [[Carolanne Adama]], so the timeline isn't consistent with our other articles.
**It has been "almost a month" since Lee Adama was wounded in "Sacrifice".
**Baltar's initial projection of the fleet's population trends took place "over seven months ago". This was ''before'' the arrival of ''Pegasus'', since he has to factor the crew of that ship in afterwards.
***Note that this quite explicitly contradicts information given on the date of the presidential election given throughout the first season (seven months from "Bastille Day", six moths from "Colonial Day") - clearly, the election should already have taken place by now.


*''Galactica''-Valerii's resurrection in '''Downloaded''' takes place ten weeks after her death in "Resistance", which was firmly dated to be absolutely no later than Day 57, and probably no later than Day 54, above. That would put "Downloaded" at around Day 124, which explicitly contradicts almost every other piece of timeline information provided since "Resurrection Ship, Part I".
And what's the source for placing Tigh's reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it's not directly from the episode I think. Going by the [[Saul Tigh]] footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn't make sense that Adama got assigned to ''Atlantia'' with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he's a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.
**[[Hera]]'s birth apparently takes place nine months after the destruction of the twelve colonies, setting the date at roughly Day 270. This makes her birth about a month premature (Valerii was impregnated sometime between Day 24 and Day 36). This is at least in line with the post-"Resurrection Ship" timeline.
**Is it possible that the scenes on Cylon-ocupied Caprica and in The Fleet do not take place concurrently?
***Downloaded denotes both Caprica and Galactica as "present day". --Redwall
***They've pretty much established that we're at "Month 9".  10 weeks ago?  A month passed between "Sacrifice" and "Captain's Hand", another during Scar, and at least two before that; that would put her death in the Cain Trilogy!  --->This is a goof!--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 23:16, 24 February 2006 (EST)
**Number Three states that Thrace was on Caprica "a couple of weeks ago". It's not entirely clear how long "The Farm" lasted, but it was clearly many months ago - Galactica-Valerii wasn't even showing in that episode, and she gives birth here.


*'''Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I''' gives us many clues.
We could change it to this:
**Zarek states that the people of the fleet have been "cooped up in metal boxes for nine months".
*23 BCH:
**Tyrol has been having nightmares for two weeks.
**Adama and Tigh meet
**The episode opens on the first day of the presidential debates. James MacManus tells us that Baltar declared his candidacy a month ago, and that the polls will open in two weeks.
**Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)
**Simultaneously, Apollo remarks that the raptor pilots will be missing five days of debate. This would seem to indicate that he expects their return within that time span.
*17 BCH:
**Roslin, Foster, Baltar and Zarek are seen reading coverage of the debates the following morning.
**Adama assigned to ''Atlantia'' makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major
**Immediately afterwards, we see the Raptor team check in and make their first jump.
**Gets Tigh back into the fleet.
**A series of events take place whose timeline is somewhat indeterminate.
**We then see Starbuck's team prepping for their final jump. This is intercut with the final presidential debate, during which MacManus states that the polls are set to open in three days.
:So, we can conclude the following:
:*Day 240: "The Captain's Hand" ends with Baltar's announcement of candidacy.
:*Day 270: Opening debate.
:*Day 271: Candidates review media coverage, Raptors depart for Caprica.
:*Day 281: Final debate. Raptors arrive at Caprica.
:*Day 284: Polls open (projected).
 
:Comments: Apollo's "five day" comment is confusing, since the Raptor team was apparently only halfway there by LDYB1 + 5, and at their rate of travel couldn't be expected to return until LDYB1 + 22 days.
:If the Raptors were only making ten jumps, as Gaeta tells us, this means that they were only making one jump per day. Although we've never seen raptors operating at such a long range before, it still seems like a slower rate than one would expect.
   
   
'''Summary of Known Information:'''
The only point I'm unsure is the time between Adama's and Tigh's reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says "Major: Battlestar Atlantia". Maybe that means he was a major on ''Atlantia'', not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
*KLG, pt. II, Scattered, Valley of Darkness, Fragged - Day 51
:The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama's accomplishments in the fleet. It would seem to me, although I'm not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions. In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment.  So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there's not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?).  This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--[[User:OrionFour|OrionFour]] 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
*The Farm: Duration unknown. Begins 8-13 days after KLG, pt. II (probably no more than 11)
::He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That's said explicitly in a deleted scene from "Scattered". The dossier doesn't really contradict on screen information as such, as "Scattered" is pretty vague about dating. We have the "20 years" from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama's and Tigh's reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as "valid until contradicted". So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I'm favoring that).
*Resistance: Covers 2 days. Ends 7 days before The Farm.
::This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
*Flight of the Phoenix: Duration is at least 14 days. Begins 30 days after Resistance.
*Resurrection Ship, Part II: Six's last appearance is at least 14 days before the beginning of "Epiphanies".
*Epiphanies: Should begin less than 30 days after Flight of the Phoenix.
*Epiphanies: Begins Day 189
*Black Market: Begins less than 60 days after Cain's assasination.
*The Captain's Hand: Thrace was assigned to ''Pegasus'' before Adama, but not by long - she was only on board for four days prior to the Battle of the Binary Star System.
*The Captain's Hand: Begins after Thrace's assignment, and "almost a month" after "Sacrifice". Probably between 21 and 29 days.
*The Captain's Hand: Baltar's comment about population statistics is at least 7.5 months (225 days) post-attack.
*Downloaded: Begins nine months post-holocaust (270 days). This is the most likely of several conflicting pieces of information.
*Lay Down Your Burdens, Part 1: Begins 30 days after the end of "The Captain's Hand."
*Lay Down Your Burdens, Part 1: One day later, Zarek states that it's about nine-months post-holocaust.
*Lay Down Your Burdens, Part 1: Ends 11 days after the first debates.


''More to come.'' --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:39, 11 December 2005 (EST)
:::My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per "Torn", in which Adama calls Tigh "The man that I've known for the past thirty years"). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in "Scattered"). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per "Act of Contrition") must take place shortly afterwards.
:::We can date Adama's marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama's [[: Image:Youngadamafamily.jpg|photo]] with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.
:::So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in "Scattered" span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh's first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh's reinstatement). Adama's comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore's comment that the "Scattered" flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
::::That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn't necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.
::::Two comments though: First, Adama's rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn't quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states "the new wife pulled through". And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
:::::Nice analysis, all. If we take the "twenty years ago" as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter's reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
::::::Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they've known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn't such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the ''Valkyrie'' mission.
::::::Also regarding Tyrol's "ten years" comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as "circa". --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)


===How You Can Help===
== Ancient History ==
I need thoughts on the following:
*How many days was Kara Thrace at the Farm on Caprica?
*How many days do both parts of "Home" span?


===Further cleanup===
*'''4,000 years BCH:''' The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky.


Firstly, I'm thinking that "Epiphanies" will take place exactly 30 days after "Flight of the Phoenix" (getting it down to the wire, last possible moment to save Roslin, etc). However, I used to think "Flight of the Phoenix" happened on day 86, now it's been moved to day 89 (I don't understand the reasoning), and FotP's date is based on Cally's arrest at the end of "Resistance", however recently the deleted scenes revealed the "The Farm" takes place one week after "Fragged".  I'm not adept enough at this to sort it all out, maybe someone else can. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 10:58, 10 December 2005 (EST)
This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.


:Which scene? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:33, 10 December 2005 (EST)
Quote Adama to Roslin "According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol"


::During the Roslin halucination scene in "Resistance", I believe; she says that the Quorum has been unsure of whether to support her or not for "a week now".  Granted, it was a dream sequence, but I think it accurately reflects what the tone of the episode was.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 22:07, 10 December 2005 (EST)
Quote Tyrol to Adama "Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe"


:::Oh, you meant The Farm, which wasn't a hallucination. That's helpful. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:01, 11 December 2005 (EST)
This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old


== 6 months? ==
Since the "undated" fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.


I thought I heard "Is that what you two have been doing out here for the last '''six months'''?" (following by something about philosophical debates and not having that luxury in time of war) from Cain on Colonial One. 180 days is a lot, so I thought I would mention it instead of add it, since I might just have heard incorrectly. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 21:34, 7 January 2006 (EST)
I would suggest that it reads as follows...


:See [[Resurrection Ship, Part I#Analysis]]. Her comment cannot possibly be correct, but on the other hand, she was speaking in haste and might have been exagerating for dramatic effect. Pegasus and Resurrection Ship almost certainly take place three months and change since the attack. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:23, 7 January 2006 (EST)
*'''4000 years BCH:''' The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]
*'''4000 - 3000 years BCH:''' The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]
*'''After 3000 years BCH:''' The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]


Further, in "[[Final Cut]]" D'Anna Biers states that Col. Tigh was in command of Galactica for "over a week"--->which is from "Scattered" to "Resistance" (maybe "The Farm").  I'm going to be liberal with this and say that was 13 days at most (obviously, this is probably not this case).  Theorizing here:  We know that Col. Tigh took command on Day 51 (on screen Fact), and that may have been in "command" for at most 14 days-->Resistance takes place on Day 65ish.  Cally is given 30 days in the brig, gets out in "Flight of the Phoenix" which begins on Day 85ish then.  Now, RDM did say that "weeks" pass during Flight of the Phoenix, which we always interpretted as "at least two weeks".  In the same episode, Roslin is told that she has one month (30 days), ''tops'', to live.  "Pegasus" could have occured right after this.  Anyway, "Epiphanies" now says that it takes place on Day 189?  Okay, subtract 14 days for the two weeks Six was gone; that's 175.  At LEAST two days pass during the Cain trilogy; so 173.  --->When does "Flight of the Phoenix" end? That's the question.  Well, subtract 30 from 173 and we get 143.  You know, no matter how many ways I look at it, I'm suspecting they're trying to pull a full-blown '''retcon''' on us, because they're apparently saying that "Flight of the Phoenix" from beginning to end lasted '''two months'''.  '''We know as stated fact that the Presidential elections are taking place on Day 222''' (give or take a week). So unless in an episode stated to take place 30 days from now, there is an election, this is just one of the biggest goofs we've ever had.  Thoughts?--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 18:13, 21 January 2006 (EST)
The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.


:Yes, that's where it stands. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:37, 21 January 2006 (EST)
Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren't written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)


::Who says FOTP didn't take 2 months? They were building a frakking ship from scratch, after all. Granted, its the biggest leap we've seen in a single episode, but is there evidence to the contrary?  --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 20:01, 21 January 2006 (EST)
:How crucial it is depends on one's preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that's what footnotes are for. It's true that it should be left somewhat open, and it's a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in ''some'' order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can't be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that's said in the footnote. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)
:::Yes. Roslin gets her one-month prognosis ''before'' Cally's release from the brig, which we can firmly date. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:39, 21 January 2006 (EST)


::Also, remember that Laura was '''''starting''''' her education-related tour thingee 189 days before Ephiphanies. I am pretty sure that she was almost ENDING it during the miniseries. So, I think we can safely say that Ephiphanies is not happening on day 189, but rather, before it. Granted, its probably not more than a week or two, but that week could be what we're missing to make the timeline coherent.   --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 20:01, 21 January 2006 (EST)
12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...
:::In his podcast, Moore states the the flashback scenes were meant to take place in between Roslin's diagnosis and her departure for Galactica, which was all in the span of one day. He admits that the timeline has to be fudged a bit to get Baltar and Six on the scene, but it was a very short time span. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:39, 21 January 2006 (EST)


::Furthermore, however, I think that we're missing gaps that occur between episodes. For instance, is there evidence that KLG took place right after Colonial Day? We listed a one day gap, but what are we basing that on? There could be a week gap there and we wouldn't know it.
Billy: Uh, well, we won't know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years.  
:::There is very firm evidence for all the first season dating, including Colonial Day and Kobol's Last Gleaming. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:39, 21 January 2006 (EST)
Elosha: That's around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol.
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)
:There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)


::I think we need to list the things we DO know (colonial day takes place on day 47, there is a 30 day gap between resistance and the beginning of FOTP, and Ephiphanies takes place in the 180 day range, etc.) and then rebuild the timeline from there, working in reasonable gaps. We are saying that there are continuity errors due to Ephiphanies, but I doubt RDM would make a blunder like that. We just think there is a continuity error because we've been speculating ao many dates and then taking them for fact. --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 20:01, 21 January 2006 (EST)
Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once  - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.
:::I have been maintaining exactly such a list at the bottom of my lengthy discussion on the topic. I encourage you to read it fully. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:39, 21 January 2006 (EST)


:::Some might call this cavalier, but this is what I ''propose'' as what I would like:  Firstly, we're going to bludgeon Ron D. Moore's blog with questions about this until we get an answer (even of the "so what?  we made it up" variety, anything).  You see, BMS, I feel that we '''should not restructure the timeline based on "Epiphanies"'''.  We should point out in the Notes section of every following episode "This is so and so many days after "Epiphanies", however note that BattlestarWiki's timeline shows that it couldn't be this".  This is either a major blunder, a retcon, or both.  We're not basing it on "Colonial Day", we're basing it on "Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part II" which was the final day that we got a date on screen (Day 51).  KLG part I begins immediately after Colonial Day as you see that Starbuck got drunk at the party then had sex with Baltar in the following episode (she has the same dress, etc).  Simply;
Billy: Uh, well, we won't know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial
:::*Kobol's Last Gleaming Part II through Valley of Darkness happen pretty much on the same day, Day 51.
estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years.  
:::*Colonel Tigh could not possibly have been in command of Galactica for a period of over two weeks. He was in command starting in "Scattered", until "Resistance", although possibly this could have extended until "The Farm".
Elosha: That's around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol.  
:::*Cally is given a sentence of 30 days in the brig in "The Farm" for shooting Boomer in "Resistance".  (we always assumed it mean 30 Days counting from when she was first arrested, not several days later when Adama sentenced her).  She gets out in "Flight of the Phoenix".
:::*Roslin is told later in Flight of the Phoenix that she has no more than one month to live.  That puts a MAXIMUM of 30 days between the END of Flight of the Phoenix and "Epiphanies".  We do know that Flight of the Phoenix DOES span a time period of WEEKS, we always assumed this was at least two.  Though I guess up to four would not be "unreasonable". 
:::*Adding them up, 51+14+30 = 90.  Flight of the Phoenix BEGINS at around at least Day 90 (although the SCENE with Roslin's diagnosis is after the scene when Cally gets out, I'm willing to fudge it and just say that scenes on different ships don't necessarily happen in order if they don't affect each other right away.  Fair enough).---->Thus, "Epiphanies" could not take place any later than Day 120, which is FOUR months, not Six (to quote Picard, "THERE...ARE...**FOUR**..." MONTHS!).  What are we supposed to believe, that Flight of the Phoenix lasted '''two months'''?  I mean the biggest "official" gap between episodes was the 10 day gap between The Hand of God and Colonial Day.
:::*Another big, "dumb question" I have:  If Pegasus-through-Epiphanies (within a few days of each other) is supposed to take place ''Six'' months after the Cylon attack, '''Why isn't Caprica-Boomer more visibly pregnant?!'''.  Her daughter was conceived a month after the attack, which would make her ''Five months pregnant'' in "Pegasus".  Yet in Pegasus, she's wearing a REALLY form fitting tank top in which she doesn't look noticeably pregnant at all.  Anyone else baffled by this?--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 10:47, 22 January 2006 (EST)


::::Roslin's prognosis is updated very early in "Flight of the Phoenix", ''before'' Cally's release from the brig, so really it should be "a maximum of 30 days between the BEGINNING of Flight of the Phoenix" and "Epiphanies". As for Boomer, she looks about five months along in "Epiphanies", but certainly did not during the "Pegasus" trilogy. I think it's fairly obvious that we just have to write off the "lost" two months as a continuity glitch - there's certainly no use badgering RDM about it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:28, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Notice the use of the term "first", also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren't neccessarily saying the the legendary "Thirteeth Tribe" was one of them.


::::Thanks, Peter. Thats what I really wanted to see, the dates that we know filled in with the dates we can speculate. It appears your right, there are 2 months missing. I didn't think that RDM would make such a huge blunder - If I were him, I would have written out all the dates George Lucas style - he had the entire Star Wars timeline from Anakin's birth to Luke's death planned out before he even released the first one back in 1977. I thought RDM, with his whole "naturalistic science fiction" crusade would have done the same. Way to frak it up, RDM. PS way to work in the Picard reference - great episode. --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 15:33, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia?
:::::No he didn't. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 16:30, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n
::::I just had another thought. Perhaps Roslins little tour lasted 2 months. If she was going to all 12 colonies, who knows? That might be the missing two months right there. Do we have a reference to the duration of that tour? --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 15:36, 22 January 2006 (EST)
its way to Earth.  


:::::See RDM's podcast for his thoughts on the duration of the flashbacks. They were originally intended to all take place in between Roslin's diagnosis and her departure for ''Galactica'', all on the same day. Note that her suit matches the one she arrived on Galactica wearing. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:43, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Notice the use of the term "original" - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.


::::::Oooh yeah... you're right. Well, I guess RDM's really frakked himself on this one. --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 19:36, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years
ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol"


::::Very good observations, and I think we should try to pressure RDM about this, if possible.  He spouts so much rhetoric about keeping it believeable that we can't really let something like this slide.  However, I don't know about using the FotP "1 month" diagnosis as the ''main'' point of continuity criticism.  While it is true that Dr. Cottle has shown to be a very good doctor and his estimate is probably a well-informed one, it is still an ''estimate.''  This certainly wouldn't be the first time a patient lived longer than a doctor expected, and it won't be the last.  Despite decades of collecting data, cancer is still not very well understood by Earth doctors, and it follows that since the Galactica world is almost identical to ours in terms of medical technology (by design), cancer is not all that well understood there either. [[User:Drumstick|Drumstick]] 15:37, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple's at least 4,000 years
:::::No.  In that episode he said he's be ''surprised'' if she lived a month. They were down to a few weeks. Jumping from that to saying "well she could have just lived two months and surprised everyone" is stretching it. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 16:30, 22 January 2006 (EST)
old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe.  
By the way, please try to read the discussion thread more carefully. As much as I don't care for Ricimer regurgitating my easily accessible notes, I'd still rather not be erroneously credited for his posts. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:11, 22 January 2006 (EST)
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)
:I'm as upset about this as you are.  I was developing my own thoughts, "thinking out loud" as it were, not "regurgitating" what you said (similarities are due to the fact that they share the same source material). --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 16:30, 22 January 2006 (EST)
:The 13th Tribe "'''first''' left Kobol" 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now ''that's'' a contradiction... --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)
::Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It's possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)


:I think we're all basically on the same page here, so there's no need to argue over who came up with what originally. [[User:Drumstick|Drumstick]] 17:37, 22 January 2006 (EST)
They don't say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don't believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...


::Come on now, this is supposed to be a *happy* occassion. Let's not ''bicker'' and ''argue'' about...who killed who...--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 17:55, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Boomer: I'm putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I'm right, that's the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes.  


:::Yeah... we're all on the same page here. Perhaps we should add a note to the bottom of the timeline page about the missing two months? Right now, it jumps from day 86 to day 175 with no explanation. Well, I guess there IS no explanation, so we should add a note saying there is no explanation... if that makes sense. Also, sorry if I mixed up who said what, this page has become a little tough to follow. My apologies to Ricimer and Peter Farago. --[[User:BMS|BMS]] 19:47, 22 January 2006 (EST)
Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol.
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)
:Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they're legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can't seem to keep their dates straight (whether it's 2, 3 or 4K years). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)


Speaking from experience, I have known two people (one relative, one relative of a close friend) with cancer who have been given the "surprised if you see out the month" speech from doctors only to survive 3 months and 18 months respectively. My point is that even the most experienced of doctors often have to make educated guesses and sometimes they don't get the figures quite right. Sometimes the cancer doesn't behave as expected or the progression through the body slows. Given what is shown of Roslyn from FOTP, Pegasus, Resurrection Ship to Epiphanies, I don't see a huge problem with her lasting the extra 60 or so days that  the timeline suggests. --[[User:Rexpop|rexpop]] 1:56, 26 January 2006 (EST)
RON MOORE COMMENTARY
8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here's the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast)  


:Thank you for your insight. On reflection, this does seem to be a plausible way to reconcile the time discrepancy. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 02:44, 26 January 2006 (EST)
You can't read much into Adama's 3000 year quote since he says "over 3000" years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can't really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.
 
   
:Your personal insight does not add further weight to your viewpoint.  I feel this violates the Citation crusade directly: unless they say directly on screen, in dialog, "wow, she lived longer than we thought", we should under no circumstances '''assume''' that she "just happened to live longer". Remember, this is a ''tv series'' where the writers are actually trying to inform they audience by stating facts on camera.  This is not a historical research paper where we are trying to find out when a real person died, and we're confused that a doctor's diagnosis notes say she would live shorter than we've been led to believe.  This is a tv series, and the writers were talking with us the audience in mind when they have Cottle on screen saying "you've got weeks, a month at the outside".  Note, at the "outside" chance, as in "a maximum of one month".  Thus, Rosl*I*n we must assume only had one month left. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 19:57, 26 January 2006 (EST)
You also agree that at some point "someone" travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows
 
::My only point is that of all the known information, Roslin's prognosis is the only thing that it is even ''possible'' to fudge. Whether or not one wishes to do so is a matter of personal interpretation. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:42, 26 January 2006 (EST)
 
::Ricimer is just dead wrong there.  If you listen to RDM he constantly talks about how his characters are living in a realistic world and are fallible.  If you take that to its logical conclusion, then Cottle is just making his best guess as to what her prognosis is.  He gives an estimate of how long she has, but, like any real doctor, he might have been wrong.  An outside chance of one month doesn't rule out something longer than one month (he just probably wouldn't have bet money on it).  And even if you went back to Cottle and he said, "She'll die within 20 days, guaranteed," one man's personal belief won't change the facts, and it looks like she lived longer than that one month.  --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 02:59, 26 February 2006 (EST)
 
:::It is irrational of you to disagree with Ricimer.  And frankly your line of thinking rings of [[Wikipedia:Truthiness|Truthiness]]: it is not "one man's OPINION"; he is a DOCTOR, his prognosis was based on science and fact.  Next, it was obviously a case of the writers essentially breaking the fourth wall, to announce to the audience, "she has one month to live".  Finally, the amount of time that we believe was lost was on the order of ''Three Months''.  It would be impossible, given the script, for Roslin to inexplicably live for four months when the medical prognosis was that she would live for one month ''at most''.  Further, it does not explain the sudden shift in Caprica-Sharon's pregnancy; how she goes from not-visibly pregnant in "Pegasus" to suddenly very pregnant:  if "Downloaded" supposedly takes place when she is eight months pregnant, and in Res Ship they say that six months have passed, making her 5 months pregnant all of a sudden?  Even when she was wearing a tank top and stuff?  Regardless, suddenly going from a "one month at best" prognosis, to "well, turns out it was four months", is a ''fantasy''.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 03:32, 26 February 2006 (EST)
 
::::It's not irrational.  It is one man's opinion, a doctor's for sure, but that still doesn't change the fact that he's making a best guess based on the information at hand.  Going by yours and Ricimer's line of reasoning, then in the context of this show, a doctor's guesses are always right, that they do not make mistakes.  But doctors do occasionally make misdiagnoses, give incorrect prognosises and make mistakes.  I admit that it is a long shot that she could last four months after a one month prognosis, but it doesn't rule out that it couldn't happen.  I understand that, by throwing out the one month prognosis in dialogue, the writers are trying to give us clues in the timeline, but the one month prognosis doesn't jive and I think that this is the best way to account for that three month gap.  I personally think that they threw that line out there in writing anzd, as we have seen, they haven't been playing as close attention to the timeline as they should.  And in regards to the pregnancy, at 5 months she'll have a nice little bulge in her belly.  What I saw in Pegasus didn't really give any view of her belly area that was clear enough to know if she has a nice bulge ... unfortunately, I don't have a copy of "Resurrection Ship, pt I" to go back and take a look the exam scene right now which might clear things up.  Oh, and thanks for the catch on the timeline for "Downloaded" BTW.  You're right that 270 is the birthdate.  --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 15:10, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::::Actually, if you can see Pegasus and Res Ship again it's ridiculous; she's wearing a tight fitting tank top and doesn't look pregnant at all. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 16:41, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 
==Duration of Home, Part I==
 
What's the basis for the recent dating for Home, Part I?  I mean in terms of quotes or something I missed.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 17:16, 8 January 2006 (EST)
 
:I don't know. It would probably be best to consider it in three parts with The Farm and Home, Part II, since they all seem to pick up where the other leaves off. I've sort of held off on re-watching them longer than I should, since they aren't really my favorite episodes... --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:00, 8 January 2006 (EST)
::If we just "assumed" 2 days had passed, etc without evidence I think it should be replaced with ?? marks. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 18:38, 8 January 2006 (EST)
:::I agree, if there's no evidence, but let's give Kahran a chance to respond. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:41, 8 January 2006 (EST)
 
== Roslin's life expectancy after "Epiphanies" ==
 
Should we remove the "Roslin's maximum/minimum life expectancy" stat now that her cancer's been all but cured?
[[User:Kahran|Kahran]] 20:58, 21 January 2006 (EST)
 
:I'd rather not. We didn't remove her older life expectancy from "Kobol's Last Gleaming, Part I" when the estimate was revised downward in "Flight of the Phoenix". Both data points might still be of interest to someone who's following the continuity of the show. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:04, 21 January 2006 (EST)
 
==When is the Presidential Election?==
 
Okay, "Res Ship, part I" and "Epiphanies" established that we are now 6 months after the Cylon attack.  (That's definately what they're *SAYING*, but I'm still saying how improbable it was and there must have been a lot of time passing in FotP). 
 
Regardless, in "[[Scar]]" 29 days pass.  Give a few as well for "Black Market" (do we know how many days pass in that?), and we'll call it an even "one month". 
 
6 months + 1 month = 7 months.  pollo stated in "Bastille Day" that they would hold elections in "seven months" when Roslin serves out President Adar's term.  So what's going on?  --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 03:11, 4 February 2006 (EST)
 
:RDM says the election will take place at the end of the season. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:18, 4 February 2006 (EST)
 
==Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes==
The "matter of weeks" timing of Black Market after Epiphanies is thorny in terms of trying to figure out when it happens.  I'm estimating 3 weeks, hence 21 days.  If it was much longer, they could have said "a month" or "almost a month" or "more than a month", if it was shorter, it could be "just a week" or the like.  It could be a little more either way, but I put dates in estimating that much time (and noted as approximate).
--Wingsandsword
 
:Seven weeks is still "a matter of weeks". All we can say about the "black market" comment is that it was definitely less than two months, since after that point it becomes "a matter of months". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 03:38, 4 February 2006 (EST)
 
:::No Wingsandsword.  Here our standard is to leave it as ?? question marks, when such a large amount of time as ''one to two weeks'' is involve.d --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 03:39, 4 February 2006 (EST)
 
::::I don't see any policy to that effect anywhere here.  I've just checked, it's nowhere in the tutorials, nowhere in the few policies listed, nowhere I can find.  There is no style guide to this wiki making things like that standard that I can tell.  It might be ''your'' personal standard, but I don't see any official opinion or policy declaration that approximate dates have a specific margin of error, that beyond "x" certainty it goes from an approximate date to a completely unknown one.  An approximate date is a lot more useful than just "???".  We don't know when, hence it is listed as "~" days.  --[[User:Wingsandsword|Wingsandsword]] 13:39, 4 February 2006 (EST)
 
== The Ten Weeks thing in "Downloaded" ==
 
Just wanted to let you guys in on a little thing regarding this "Ten Weeks Ago" thing that popped up in "Downloaded"... I was contacted by a bona-fide member of the post-production crew on BSG.  While I can't get into specifics, since I didn't ask to do so, I can tell you folks that the production crew figured that the "Ten Weeks Ago" thing was a mistake (which came from the script) and this will be corrected in the home video releases and the international views to read "Ten Weeks After" (the attack).  It was the fan's outcry -- and the meticulous work done on this timeline -- that brought around this correction.  All our hard working contributors should be proud -- I know I am. Pretty frakkin' cool, huh? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] 20:30, 2 March 2006 (CST)
:It is pretty cool, but "ten weeks after the attack" is still wrong - Sharon's death can't ''possibly'' have been any later than Day 57, ie, roughly eight weeks. Nor does it address the other issue in this episode - Three's statement that Kara was on Caprica "a couple weeks ago", while Caprica-Valerii wasn't even visibly pregnant yet; nor the 74 days which seem to have vanished into the ether between "Pegasus" and "Resurrection Ship". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:18, 2 March 2006 (CST)
:: FYI, I've mailed the person in question your comments. I'm interested to see what happens with this. I'll keep you folks posted. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] 21:39, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::I was going to chime in on this myself: Our entire timeline supports the idea that it could not have been Day 70 (ten weeks); that was around Home, Part II.  Would you guys agree that "8 weeks after" would be a good working figure?  (I mean "weeks" leaves it "fuzzy around the edges", as it were, giving some 2-3 day stretch time, no need to get exact.--[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 00:10, 3 March 2006 (CST)
 
== Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note ==
I'm sorry to say that the whole Chronology Note on this episode has several errors in it that need correcting. Rather than edit it myself, I'm starting this thread so that there is some agreement on what it is edited to. I rewatched 'Flight of the Phoenix' the other weekend from the Season 2.0 DVD set and the order of events in the episode is:
 
1) Caly gets released from the Brig
2) Tyrol starts building the backbird
3) Laura gets her one month to live diagnosis
4) Galactica routs Cylon attack
5) Tyrol completes the Blackbird.
 
So the statement that Laura's diagnosis happended before Caly was released from the brig is wrong. And there is no indication that the scene happened in flashback either. It's possible that they re-edited the episode for the DVD but I haven't seen a posting to indicate that this happened. So I would suggest that this note is removed and the episode timeline entry corrected to break out the 5 events, as they did occur on seperate days over a three month period. --[[User:Rexpop|Rexpop]] 15:38, 3 March 2006 (CST)
 
:Thank you; I was running off of some back information from someone else, but upon viewing a transcript at GalacticaStation, it appears that Roslin is givern her diagnosis AFTER Cally returns; this is great, and a lot simpler; now it just means that months pass between these two scenes. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 17:36, 3 March 2006 (CST)
 
::To clear things up I've tidied up the section for this episode. I've broken out the events as happening on different days and moved the chronology note to the notes section for further cleaning up. I've also indicated that the day of Cally's release is approximate as we don't have a firm date from when the 30 days starts from. Hopefully this will help keep the timeline fairly clean. and clear --[[User:Rexpop|Rexpop]] 21:33, 3 March 2006 (CST)
 
== Fine Tuning "Black Market" Through "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I" ==
 
I know that we've been able to pin the start date of "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I" to be around Day 270, but I think it we might be able to further fine tune that number to be more like Day 276.  Going forward from "Epiphanies," the timeline is as follows:
* At least two days pass in "Epiphanies" putting the earliest start date for the events in "Black Market" to be around Day 191.
* At least one day passes in "Black Market," which means that the mining operations in "Scar" could not start until Day 192 at the earliest.  Since the mining ops in "Scar" take 29 days, [[Galactica (RDM)|Battlestar ''Galactica'']] could not return to the fleet until Day 221 at the earliest.
* The return of [[Galactica (RDM)|Battlestar ''Galactica'']] to the fleet means that the events of "Sacrifice" could not begin until Day 221.
* Lee's recovery from the shooting in "Sacrifice" has lasted "almost a month."  If we assume this is longer than three weeks and less than a month, around 25 days, then the starting date for "The Captain's Hand" would be around Day 246.
* In "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I" the moderator of the debate states that Baltar announced his candidacy one month ago (in "The Captain's Hand"), putting the the beginning of the episode at around Day 276.
It's six days, I know, but I think with the information at hand we can reliably date the timline for the final stretch of the season.  Any thoughts, other information I'm missing?  --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 14:39, 7 March 2006 (CST)
 
:I agree.  If we look at Starbuck's SAR, how can it take them 10 days to jump from the Fleet to Caprica and only one day to jump back?  If we put "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I" at Day 276, that would seem a little more likely (ie, four days of Jumps and calculations to get there, one day to get back).  --[[User:Bahamut|Bahamut]] 04:00, 12 March 2006 (EST)
 
::It still doesn't take care of some of the consistencies in "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I," though.  Right before the debates Six says it will be two weeks before the election, yet in the briefing room right before the first debate Lee says they're listening in to see what they are looking forward to over the next 5 days, either meaning that the debates are only going to last 5 days or the SAR mission is going to last 5 days, yet after the last debate, the announcer says the election will be in three days and the SAR mission hasn't returned home yet (and yes, the SAR mission did run a day long, so I think it ran 6 days, while the debates ran 5.  The 5 day format makes sense to me ... 1 day for debate, 1 day for rest, 1 day for second debate, 1 day for rest, 1 day for final debate) --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 23:38, 12 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::Something which just ocurred to me - the "three days away" comment explicitly refers to the polls ''opening''. Perhaps the "two weeks away" comment refers to them ''closing''. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:42, 12 March 2006 (CST)
 
::::Maybe, but Six explicitly says the "election" is two weeks away ... I think it might be that there's a good 7 days or so between the close of the debates and the actual election.  That would mean the SAR team would get back from Caprica around Day 282 and you'd have a week for the action to play out of Rosalin coming to Baltar, Anders and Thrace and Lee, etc.  If no-one has any other major inputs, I'll go ahead and edit the S2.5 timeline to reflect these changes. --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 00:18, 13 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::::Please don't. We're very explicitly told that the final debate was three days before the polls open, when McManus says "This concludes the cycle of the debates for the presidency. The polls will be open in three days." --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 14:56, 13 March 2006 (CST)
 
::::::Sorry, wasn't clear about what I'd proposed the edit on ... it would be for the stretch between Epiphanies and Lay Down Your Burdens I&II (the timeline I wrote out above).  The timline for Lay Down Your Burdens I&II would remain intact, just shifted down by by 6 days.  --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 01:44, 14 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::::::I'm confused. I thought it was pretty clear that the LDYB timeline I posted is based on a rough estimate of Baltar's "nine months" comment. There should be about two weeks of wiggle room on either side. I don't think we've even tried to link it up conclusively to Epiphanies yet, which will be a complicated challenge. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:50, 14 March 2006 (CST)
 
::::::::I'm confused as to what you're confused about ... with the information at hand we can reasonably date the timeline from Ephiphanies through LDYB ... I don't see a good place to put the proposed edit here, so I can put it on my talk page for you to look at.  --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 23:09, 15 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::::::::I'll be interested to see your argument. I don't believe we currently have enough information to do that conclusively. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:30, 15 March 2006 (CST)
 
::::::::::Neither do I. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 23:57, 15 March 2006 (CST)
 
:::::::::::It's up on my talk area if you want to look now.  --[[User:LindyChef|LindyChef]] 14:05, 22 March 2006 (CST)
 
===Issues with LindyChef's Analysis===
:''Link: [[User_talk:LindyChef#Example_of_proposed_edit_for_the_RDM_Timeline_page_for_s2.5]]''
*How can Resurrection Ship Parts 1 & 2 be firmly dated? All we know is that at the ''latest'', Gina and Baltar last spoke 14 days prior to epiphanies. What else constrains these events?
*What's the motivation for placing "Black Market" mere days after Epiphanies? There's no reason this couldn't be the case, of course.
*As I discussed above, isn't it possible that the asteroid mining operations were already underway during "Black Market"?
 
Thanks for your work on this thus far. I look forward to your reply. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 16:31, 22 March 2006 (CST)
 
== Timeline Image ==
 
I been working with a cool program that does a timeline bar. . I can even make it clickable if SVG files are enabled. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:36, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
 
:I doubt that the visual aid will benefit this article. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:40, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
 
:: In it's very impomplete form. Just giving an idea. Once i figure out all the parmaters then I will post a more realisisc bar. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:43, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
 
<br clear="both">
 
== Days v. Day ==
 
I am very confused. I am working on the timeline image, and days are driving me nutz. Days are like 46 days. 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 and so on... and day is a single day right? --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 15:32, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
 
:There's not much meaningful difference, we switched from "46 Days" to "Day 46" about halfway through season one and never corrected the older entries. Side note - your timeline right not indicates that "33" spanned five days, but it really only took place over about three hours at the end of day 6. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 10:05, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 
==Dating "The Captain's Hand"==
 
"Epiphanies" and the Cain Trilogy take place at Six Months after the Cylon attack.  It's stated that mining operations in "Scar" lasted one month.  It's stated that one month passes between "Sacrifice" and "The Captain's Hand".  It's stated that the next episode, "Downloaded", is 9 months post-attack.  Start at Six months, plus 1 for "Scar", plus 1 for stated gap between Sacrifice and Captain's Hand, Captain's Hand takes place at least 8 months post-attack.  *****Do we have any idea whatsoever how much time passes between Captain's Hand and Downloaded?  Because I'm going consider it just "0ver 8 months" I guess.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:47, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
:Nevermind, LDYB I firmly dates Captain's Hand as 1 month before it.  --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:57, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
::Yep. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:16, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
 
==Future Events==
Is it possible to delete the furute events that have a line through them? I really don't see the point of keeping them.--[[User:Quig|Quig]] 16:07, 6 September 2006 (CDT)
:You know, I kind of like the 'timeline graveyard.'  It shows what issues arose and that the show is taking care of them in one way or another.  ...  Now, better organizing/displaying it is another matter.  That lineout stuff is none too pretty. - [[User:Keithustus|Keithustus]] 14:33, 23 October 2006 (CDT)
 
== "Circa:" the enemy of all anal historians ==
 
Now that LDYB II and the beginning of season 3 has provided us some hard dates, I would really appreciate it if someone (Bart voice: "Not me!") rigorously checked the dates of the events of LDYB II and Occupation.  From there, it would be relatively easy to accurately sequence the webisodes and subsequent season 3 episodes.  I just sped through Occupation/Precipice/Exodus to get their timelines at least worked out, but we're in a bad place that pretty much everything after the Cylon arrival starts with "c. Day ###" - [[User:Keithustus|Keithustus]] 14:28, 23 October 2006 (CDT)


:I know circa is ugly, but we can't clean anything up. We know when Cylon occupation began relative to the settling of New Caprica, and we know when Season 3 opened relative to the occupation, but the settling of New Caprica itself is only known to have taken place in the vicinity of nine months after the fall of the colonies. Thus, we are stuck with the "circa". --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:50, 21 November 2006 (CST)
4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple


== the Colonial calender ==
# Got to Earth
# Named the constellations after their "lost" brothers
# Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map


Since '''Hero''' has revealed how the Colonial calender counts it's years and the the "current" year is 21,356 the timeline should be updated.  ([[User:Alphaboi867|Alphaboi867]] 19:27, 19 November 2006 (CST))
2000 years: The "reunited" 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies
: I disagree with the usage of these dates, particularly in lieu of [[:Image:Execution Order Signature.png|the document Baltar signed]] in "[[Precipice]]". -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 20:53, 19 November 2006 (CST)
*Indeed, the document gives that particular day as "3454-91". -- [[User:Troyian|Troyian]] 21:23, 19 November 2006 (CST)
::There's even a different (third) timekeeping system used on Adama's letter of resignation in "Hero". The Dossier is useful for pinning down relative dates, but I don't think we should read too much into the calendar system. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:25, 20 November 2006 (CST)
:::There's also a not-so-clear chart on Laura Roslin in "Epiphanies", which was located at the foot of her sickbay bed. We see this briefly and it is blurry enough not to make out specific numbers, but said document appears to be using a different dating structure as well.  Also, given the [[Cimtar Peace Accords]] documents and [[Cylon Centurion Model 0005]] in the mini-series, the documents should be treated with a healthy skepticism. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 10:13, 20 November 2006 (CST)


Another thought... in general, I have to say that we should probably avoid using in-universe dating, and go with keeping the dating system as simple as possible (using the Fall of the Colonies as a baseline). Since there is more than enough evidence thus far proving that the in-universe dating system is inconsistently applied, I believe using this would only lead to horrible inaccuracies, the bane of any reference's existence. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 10:13, 20 November 2006 (CST)
Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script, has no contradictions and interpets the quotes *exactly* as written.


==The Hero Continuity Discrepency==
Your just getting confused with "13th tribe" which reference one tribe, and "13 tribes" which references all 13.
Given the amount of discussion it has generated on other BSG websites I have been surprised to note that the enormous continuity errors in Hero haven't been discussed here. Namely the error that Adama was on board Valkyrie 1 year before the attacks and was given command of Galactica afterwards as a retirement posting, yet in You Can't Go Home Again he states that he has commanded Starbuck "On THIS ship," for more than 2 years. There's also the problem that he served with Tyrol for 5 years (and Tyrol listed all of the battlestars he served on in Resistance and Valkyrie wasn't one of them), Gaeta for 3 years prior to the attack, Boomer for 2 years and Captain Kelly for some time as well (didn't he say 2 years as well in the mini?). I can see Adama taking Tigh with him from Valkyrie to Galactica, but 5 other crewmen as well? And a fairly random selection at that (a flight operations officer, a bridge officer, a nugget, a pilot, a deckhand, assuming Tyrol was in a more junior post at that time)? Plus only Tigh and Adama knew Bulldog. Starbuck and Tyrol seemed to have no idea who he was.


To add to the chaos, Adama seems to genuinely believe that he could have sparked the Attack on the Colonies. This is impossible as Adama served with Boomer for 2 years prior to the Attack, thus the Cylons were infiltrating the Colonies 1 year before the Valkyrie mission and Adama knows this. By itself, this seems to indicate that the Valkyrie mission must take place considerably earlier than it is claimed.
--[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)
:Except that if it happened that way, then the knowledge of where the 13th tribe went would be with the twelve colonies (since people who had been to earth would be among the twelve colonies). The tribes always have seemed to correspond to the colonies, so having a thirteenth in the mix would upset the pattern. What's really affecting my thinking (and likely the thinking of others) is the way the exodus pattern unfolded in TOS. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:24, 7 January 2008 (CST)


Possible solutions:
The knowledge IS with the 12 colonies, the constellation map, the knowledge of the Temple, the chronicle of the original journey also bear in mind that when the 13th colony got to Earth, the other 12 tribes were (according to RON MOORE) considered "lost" --[[User:Swozie|Swozie]] 08:29, 7 January 2008 (CST)
1) Adama was in charge of Galactica and went to Valkyrie to do this one special mission, requesting that Bulldog and Tigh go with him. UNLIKELY: Tyrol, Starbuck and Athena should still have recognised Bulldog (they missed a trick by not having Bulldog bump into Athena, recognise her as a Cylon and freaking out btw). Bulldog definitely was not on Galactica before as he wanted to know what Adama was doing on such an old ship. This is still problematic as Boomer's presence would tell Adama that the Cylons were already infiltrating the Colonies, thus his mission had nothing to do with the Attack.
:This timeline seems to make sense. Maybe we should try asking Brad or MrsRon whether this timeline is correct and there were actually 2 exoduses. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:58, 7 January 2008 (CST)


2) The producers forgot about the year on New Caprica, so the Valkyrie mission was actually 2 years before the Attack. However, this causes problems in that Adama had still served with Gaeta and Tyrol by that point. Moving it back to 3 years before the Attack (meaning the producers forgot about the year on New Caprica and nine months the series spanned before that as well, which seems ludicrous) only gives us Tyrol to worry about and that can be explained by Tyrol being on Valkyrie (and serving on the other flight pod to the one Bulldog used and being in a junior position, so he never worked with him) and going with the Old Man to Galactica (and forgetting to list Valkyrie among his previous posts). That seems to be fine. The only problem with this is that this means that Bulldog was a prisoner of the Cylons for SIX years, not three, a very considerable difference.
== "Lost Time", and other notes... ==


Solution: There isn't one. At least with the last big screw-up (Flight of the Phoenix) it was possible to come to a conclusion by saying that episode took place over two to three months. With this problem, it seems totally self-contradictory (I wonder if RDM didn't do a podcast for this episode simply because he realised how messed up the timeline was).
I think we should really note that there are various "lost time" events (i.e. "Flight of the Phoenix", "Downloaded", and even those inferred by "He That Believeth In Me") that we should note. Further, I think it would be wise to point out that there might be inaccuracies in this timeline that can never be rectified due to the lack of definitive information. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
:I thought "Downloaded" was cleared up on the DVD release? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 03:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


EDIT: I just found some discussion on the Hero episode page, which basically seems to reach the same conclusion I did: there isn't an explanation except the dialogue in this episode is plain wrong. Oh well.--[[User:Werthead|Werthead]] 16:24, 26 November 2006 (CST)
==BCE occurences==
<br/><br/>
*If we're supposing that the current year is 21356 (based on Adama's 45 years in service beginning in 21311), this is the only explanation I've found that works in the timeline:


:*D6/21311 First commission: Battlestar Galactica fighter squadron
[http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=BCE&go=Go This search] gives 10 occurences of the BCE style, all of them in infoboxes on characters making it to Earth.
...
:*C2/21345 Commander: Battlestar Valkyrie
:*C2/21348 Commander: Battlestar Galactica
...
:*''21353 Commissioned for Valkyrie mission/Bulldog captured/Adama sent back to Galactica to retire (this wouldn't be on Adama's service record)''
:*''21354 Cylons attack the 12 Colonies''
:*''21356 Bulldog returns/Adama awarded medal of distinction.''


'''Further explanation:''' Since the time frame is fuzzy, it could be explained in retrospect that Adama had already fallen out of favor with the Admiralty and been stationed on Galactica for 5 years before they gave him one final chance to return to his old ship and crew. If he succeeded, he'd resume command of the Valkyrie; if he failed, he'd gracefully retire with Galactica. He failed, but this time took Tigh with him. Bulldog was asking Tigh how ''he'' ended up on Galactica, not specifically Adama. This fits the dialogue AND the timeline, and would not appear on the service record due to it being a black-ops mission. --[[User:Empire279|Empire279]] 19:56, 9 December 2006 (CST)
Sure the series ends with the note that all these events are supposed to be in the distant past from our perspective, culminating in the long-past settlement of our planet.  


== Unfinished Business ==
However, shouldn't at least the infoboxes if not the articles alltogether remain within the confines of the series chronology, i.e. use BCH?
I just got done with this episode and it confused me a little over the timeline so I came here to try to clear it up, but I find I'm just further confused.


The events at the groundbreaking were 17 months before the episode and 8 months before the Cylon occupation of New Caprica. What confused me at first was since The Resistance covered the 4 months after the occupation, the exodus from New Caprica must have taken place 12 months after the groundbreaking, meaning the fleet has been traveliing again for 5 months. This didn't seem right to me, though I don't think there's anything essentially wrong with it - I just felt like it had been a shorter time.
Also, there is a spoiler problem. By adding BCE to all these infoboxes, all these articles give away that Galactica cannot be finding our contemporary earth.


But when I came here to try to clear it up I ran into this:
Finally, the date in question - and note it's the same date on every page is purely an estimation. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


Day 660 (380th day since settlement): Cylon forces occupy New Caprica.  
: We should not be using BCE at all, since there is nothing that states that the Colonial Calendar lines up exactly with the Earth calendar. Please remember that the Earth calendar has been revised several times in human history, so we've never had a consistent calendar to begin with anyway. As there is no direct correlation between an Earth year being the same as a Colonial year, and as such we should keep all times in BCH (Before Colonial Holocaust) or ACH (After Colonial Holocaust). -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 14:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
::Well, there is a link between the two systems as the ending of the series is .... years before our present. But that is revealed only in the last few moments of the show and should not form the basis for dates given here. It does make more sense to say Lee Adama died x years after the Cylon holocaust.
::That the Earth calendar (actually is not one Earth calendar) has been revised is of no consequence however, as a) it makes little no differences to the years, b) BC is merely our present Gregorian calendar calculated backwards. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 15:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
:::That is the only link. There is nothing that supports a direct correlation between how the Colonial calendar works and the Earth calendar (i.e. a Colonial year could be 380 days or more, as seems to be supported by Caprica occuring only ''50'' years before the Fall and not the 52-53 needed, if we're going by the 4,571 days that the First Cylon War took). And yes, the calendar has been modified since its inception as we learn more about the rotation of our planet and other factors, and there are vast differences between the two calendars that cause discrepancies. Just look at the Julian calendar versus the Gregorian calendar. Since we do not know what the discrepancy is between the Colonial calendar and the Second Earth (our real-life) calendar, we should just do away with the whole BCE thing in terms of the BSG universe, since it adds a level of error and complication we do not need. This is something that I honestly do not believe that RDM will ever explain, since that's not how RDM really works at all. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 18:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
::::We are basically on the same side on the actual issue: do away with BCE.
::::We only disagree about little things you said or rather about their relevance to this issue. As I said, there is no "the Calendar" on earth. Earth rotation only commands the day and that has been pretty much stable.
::::I agree that is probably a discrepancy between year-lengths and day-length if directly compared to ours. TOS was certainly more "realistic" on that account.
::::Back to the issue: can you suggest a ACH wording to replace the current BCE one. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::I'll go even further.... There's no reason to note they died at all, since that's really a given and there were no special circumstances to their death. There really is no reason to use "died sometime after XXX ACH" in the infobox at all, since you would have to do that to '''every''' infobox for '''every''' character who survived up to the arrived at the new Earth. We should really leave the death section of infoboxes for confirmed deaths, not assumed. However, that's a topic for another talk page. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
::::::Actually you are right. After all, the whole Wiki variously works under the "state as of the last episode" mode, talking about deceased characters - but from the perspective of 150,000 years later all would be deceased. [[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 08:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::Absolutely. The only definitive evidence of anyone actually dying is [[Hera Agathon]]! All the other deaths should be logically assumed, barring some extremely odd and supernatural event.  -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 20:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


If this happened a year after the order to settle New Caprica (as shown in [[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part II]]), that would lead me to believe that the order was given on day 300. And that the grounbreaking was on day 420 (8 months before the occupation). But the timelime has these fixed at about Day 285 and Day 315 respectively.
:These are supposed to be 150,000 Earth years, aren't they? That's the time given in the article Ron is reading. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 17:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
::So this is how the 148,000 BC numberes originates: 150,000 years minus 2,000 years.
::'''My proposal is change the current text to ''"died after the settlement of New Earth in ... ACH"''.
::How many years after the Cylon Holocaust does the series end? Our season timelines (which actually are not timelines at all) do not help in this. The best estimation I have is based on a comment during the mutinty, which talks about "fighting the Cylons for four years" - that this fits with the four seasons is probably no coincidence.
::So how about  '''''"died after the settlement of New Earth in 4 ACH?"'''''
::[[User:Str1977|Str1977]] 09:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::The BSG timeline is wonky and wrought with various contradictions; Tom Zarek made a reference for "five years" in Season 4, there's that one year gaffe in "Hero", and "Caprica" (along with "Razor") introduces some delightfully fun inconsistencies of their own. As I said earlier, I'm not fond of noting deaths in infoboxes unless absolutely confirmed. We can assume that every one of the 38,000+ survivors (or, indeed, anyone else in the series) is well dead, buried and rotted to nothing after the 150,000 jump. This being the case, we can either make a carte blanche note that everyone died sometime after the discovery of the Second Earth (which is easy enough to do directly in the infobox's syntax itself), or simply leave the field blank in the infobox. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 20:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


The date of the settlement order isn't that bad - a difference of 15 days from what I expected could easily be rounded off to 1 year. But the groundbreaking listed at day 315 doesn't make any sense to me given the jump of one year in [[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part II]] and the fact that the groundbreaking was 8 months before the occupation ([[Unfinished Business]]).
== Real-world events within the timeline? ==


Can anyone shed any light on this?
Since RDM has clearly stated on more than one occasion that the events of ''BSG'' lead to us in the real world, how do we handle real-life history within the confines of the timeline? For example, Admiral Adama scattered the survivors throughout the world at the end of "[[Daybreak, Part II]]." Real-life science and archaeology shows us that humans did ''not'' originate in or settle in any of those areas (except for the African area, where the survivors landed) 150,000 years ago. As such, should we make it clear in the articles that these survivors died out very quickly? Keeping with real-world history, that's precisely what would have taken place. (And their remains must've been rapidly devoured and scattered to bits by the local fauna!)


[EDIT] I thought about this a bit more, and while I was a little surprised at the dates involved, I think the biggest problem is why the groundbreaking for the colony is a full four months after the order to settle on New Caprica - something that is simply a problem from the show itself, and not something a timeline can work around.
The same applies with Hera being described as Mitochondrial Eve, the MRCA. This is factually incorrect, as the MRCA existed much more recently than 150k years ago (more like between 10k and 50k years ago). Also, Mitochondrial Eve would be the most recent common matrilineal ancestor, anyway, not the MRCA. They're two different things.


--[[User:Jp Corkery|Jp Corkery]] 06:16, 7 December 2006 (CST)
I ask this because with any other science fiction series, it's all within an ''internal'' timeline, not connected to the real world. However, as I said, RDM has stated that the point of the show was to connect with the real world.


:Was it the groundbreaking for the colony of New Caprica City itself (which was already being settled) or for some building or structure there? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:10, 13 December 2006 (CST)
So...how should this be handled? I hope I made sense. Thanks in advance for your input... -- [[User:Liquidcross|Liquidcross]] 01:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


:I too assumed it was the groundbreaking of some random building. However, the (unofficial) transcript says:
:Hmm. It's obviously not '''exactly''' like the real world. I think things where we don't know exactly what happened don't need mentioning. However likely something like "this settlement died out" may be, it's still speculative. There's no pressing need to fill in the part of the timeline between the penultimate and final scenes of Daybreak. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 14:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
:"(Baltar breaks ground o­n the settlement to the sound of applause and cheers; Jammer and Duck are there.)
:Baltar: Thank you. Let this day be remembered as the day we broke ground for our new tomorrow."
:I don't know. His rhetoric definitely sounds a bit grandiose for an administration building or a hospital (not to mention having the big party that was thrown). Troubling... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 19:45, 13 December 2006 (CST)


:I too believe it was for the settlement as a whole and not just a building, perhaps it was a little of both. The ground breaking could had been for the first '''''permanent''''' building for the settlement on [[New Caprica]] as opposed to mere tents and huts. At any rate, we are give hard dates in which to measure the passage of time and I agree that the non flashback events of [[Unfinished Business]] takes place five months after the events of [[Collaborators]], I think that was the last time we were given a hard and fast date before Unfinished Business ("three days after the Second Exodus"). Also, I don't think it was just two days after the events of [[Hero]] that the events of Unfinished Business happened. I don't think after the bad beating Adm. Adama got at the hands of Lt. Novacek he would climb into a boxing ring just two days later, I don't think Doctor Cottle would allow it. I feel at least a week if not two seems more reasonable. And for the record I think it was more than a few days between Unfinished business and [[The Passage]]. I think two weeks at least feels more comfortable for the Colonials to detect the problem and then conduct a search while the fleets previously processed non contaminated food supply that people had in their cubbards and refrigerators a chance to deplete. From the looks at when Lee Adama, Starbuck and company wolfed down their remaining food it was a considerable amount of time between finding the problem to near starvation. It must be noted no matter what, Galactica is on a different time flow than we are. After all there have been only about 8 episodes (treat [[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I]] & [[Lay Down Your Burdens, Part II|II]], [[Occupation]] & [[Precipice]] and [[Exodus, Part I]] & [[Exodus, Part II|II]] as three two hour episodes each) between the events of [[Downloaded]] and the birth of [[Hera]] (aired May 2, 2006); and the events in [[The Eye of Jupiter]], when Athena learned that she was still alive (aired December 15, 2006). Only eight months have passed in our time but that is two years elapsed time in Galactica's timeline at least. [[User:Hunter2005|Hunter2005]] 03:57, 21 December 2006 (CST)
: Concur with Noneofyourbusiness. I do think that noting the facts that Liquidcross pointed out in the "notes" section or as references would suffice. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:25, 30 December 2023

Caprica Boomer's conception and morning sickness, Home II, Saul and Bill vs. The Evil Cylons, Untangling Season 2


6 months?, Duration of Home, Part I, Roslin's life expectancy after "Epiphanies", When is the Presidential Election?, Timing of Events of Black Market and later episodes, The Ten Weeks thing in "Downloaded", Flight Of The Phoenix Chronology Note, Fine Tuning "Black Market" Through "Lay Down Your Burdens, Part I"


Timeline Image, Days v. Day, Dating "The Captain's Hand", Future Events, "Circa:" the enemy of all anal historians


Timeline Image, the Colonial calender, The Hero Continuity Discrepency, Unfinished Business, Justification of the change of the timeline, Episode timeline slight adjustment, Major Cleanup Needed, I propose to shift "Lay Down Your Burdens Parts I & II" over about 10 days., Another Colonial Date in "Precipice", Split Idea, Ancient history


Adama meeting Saul

Adama and Saul have said on several occasions that they've known each other for 30 years. Why does this article say they met 20 years before the attacks? Shouldn't it be 30? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zethon (talk • contribs).

According to Bradley Thompson he is exaggerating, and it's closer to 23 years. Maybe a note about that would help. --Serenity 05:20, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
Definitely note it. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 16:35, 26 June 2007 (CDT)
Already did so :) --Serenity 16:42, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

"Hero" Timeline Issues, revisited

The alterations to the established timeline made in "Hero" continue to be problematic, and have allowed portions of Galen Tyrol and Felix Gaeta's articles to be contaminated with what I consider to be fancruft.

To review: All materials prior to "Hero", as well as Adama's Dossier from that episode, indicate that Adama had served on Galactica for several years:

  • Gaeta: "And may I also take this opportunity to say it's been both a pleasure and an honor to serve under you these past three years." (Miniseries)
  • Tyrol: "Sir, on behalf of Deck Crew Five I'd like to present a token of our esteem and appreciation for the many years you've served as commanding officer of this ship." (Miniseries)
  • Adama: "Chief Tyrol's been under my command for over five years" (Litmus)

No indication is made that either Gaeta or Tyrol served under him on any other ship than Galactica. In fact, when listing the ships he's served on in the past, Tyrol fails to mention Valkyrie:

  • Tyrol: I've served on battlestars since I was 18 years old. The Pegasus, Columbia, Atlantia, Galactica-- (Resistance).

In real-world militaries, it would be quite remarkable for lower-ranked officers like Gaeta and NCOs like Tyrol to transfer from ship to ship with their commander. The long-running team of Tigh and Adama is remarkable as it is.

The timeline provided by Adama's Dossier fits very well with the information above, placing his service on Valkyrie from -9 to -6 years BCH, and his service on Galactica from -6 to 0 years BCH. This is enough time for both Tyrol and Gaeta to have served with him for five and three years respectively, on Galactica, and enough time that Tyol's comment about the "many years you've served as commanding officer of this ship" makes sense.

Problems ensue when we try to take the dialogue from "Hero" into account:

  • Adama: "That's right. He's one of mine. Disappeared about three years ago. We think that he was captured."
  • Novacek: "Well, sir, it's like this. The enemy had me locked in a cell for three years."
  • Roslin: "About a year prior to the Cylon attack on the Colonies, you were on a mission with Admiral Adama. Is that correct?"
  • Thrace: "Novacek was held on a baseship for three years[...]"

All this indicates that Adama was transferred to Galactica on -1 BCH, which demands that (a) Tyrol and Gaeta served with him on Valkyrie and transferred with him to Galactica, and (b) completely invalidates Tyrol's statement from the Miniseries about Adama's lengthy command of Galactica.

My preference here is to simply throw out the dialogue from "Hero", and put Bulldog's aborted mission at -6 BCH - "three years ago" should be changed to "eight years ago", and "about a year prior to the Cylon attack" should be changed to "about six years prior...". Where relevant, the contradiction should be footnoted.

The alternative, attempting to reconcile Gaeta and Tyrol's backstory with Adama's, is impossible, and should not be attempted. --April Arcus 16:15, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

I couldn't agree more. Finally someone points that out. Usually I don't take printed documents like that at face value, because there are small errors in a few them. But as you said, other evidence always indicated that Adama served on Galactica for a few years. Not just Tyrol's very explicit line, but also how others like Gaeta and Kelly act around him. "Hero" messed that up, but I always chose to see it as an error in dialogue. For me it makes more sense to place the Stealthstar mission at maybe 8 years or so before the series. Thinking that Tyrol (and Gaeta!) followed him from Valkyrie to Galactica just complicates things unnecessarily. It's beyond me why the more silly way was chosen. --Serenity 16:23, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
It's clearly a mistake by the writers, but I'm skeptical about us choosing new dates for events as opposed to those established (however misguidedly) onscreen, this seems like just another form of fancruft. As Mr. Farago states, it is impossible to reconcile without delving into fancruft territory, so how about we just "teach the controversy", adding short notes and linking to an article explaining the discontinuity. My personal opinion is that Adama's Dossier, with its two seconds of screentime, was not intended to have been taken as seriously as we tend to do here, it having been just produced quickly by the art department, without significant guidance from the executive producers.OTW 18:43, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
Frankly, the contradictions should be noted. I agree to "teaching the controversy", as OTW suggested, noting the discrepancies in the appropriate articles. "Hero" is a big error when looking at the overall picture, but one that we can't ignore by simply "throwing out the dialogue", which is like throwing out the baby with the used bathwater. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 19:55, 20 October 2007 (CDT)
I'd normally agree. It seems absurd to let a prop visible for two minutes overrule four lines of episode dialogue, and our continuity policy, which I personally promulgated, favors newer content over older in the face of conflicting evidence. I'm loathe to make an exception, since that leads to a slippery slope, but I feel like we can get away with it here for a couple reasons:
  • In addition to the dossier, there are at least five episodes corroborating the earlier version, vs. just Hero in favor of the later version.
  • The early version is integral to Tyrol's backstory and can't be reconciled with the later version.
  • As a "one-off" not connected to the overall story arc, it seems unlikely that Novacek or the events of "Hero" will be referenced again.
In light of this, I feel comfortable making the Miniseries/Litmus/Resistance/Dossier (and, as I noted some time ago in Talk:Hero/Archive1#Possible_Discontinuity, "Act of Contrition" and "The Farm") consensus the "official" version, and footnoting the "Hero" version. If necessary, a separate page explaining the particular continuity glitch and our policy to it could be drafted and linked. --April Arcus 01:22, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
That seems about right, how about this compromise: In articles relating to Hero we use the "Hero version", footnoting the "official version" and then in the rest of the wiki do the opposite. If Battlestar Galactica isn't entirely self-consistent, Battestar wiki doesn't need to be either. We know that RDM values a lot of things above continuity. OTW 04:40, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
Sad, but true. That said, we have the opportunity to consistently document inconsistencies. While RDM is more bound to his muse and to storytelling, I say we throw in our lot with accuracy, consistency, and concision (anf if things occasionally get a little foot-notey we can live with it). --Steelviper 05:29, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
It's infinitely more absurd to assume that both Tyrol and Gaeta followed him to Galactica. I cringe every time I read that somewhere. But it's not just about his dossier. Dialogue in the Miniseries heavily implied, if not established, that he served on Galactica for several years. Then there are several dates in other episodes. I really don't understand this rule that there can't possibly be an error in dialogue. This isn't the only case where things were bent around so that the dialogue can stay as it is. Yeah, the prop/art department has made some errors in the past, and ones that can easily be ignored, but this is a case were their stuff fits (though I agree that it's taken a bit too seriously now and then) and the writers contradicted their own work. Usually people throw up their arms at the slightest hint of fanwanking and then something like this gets approved by everyone...
As for the "Hero" page. We can leave the "three years" in the summary and then explain the error in Analysis. All other pages use "eight years" with a footnote for the explanation and maybe a link to that section. --Serenity 05:53, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
The pages Daniel Novacek, Valkyrie, Stealthstar, Corman and Armistice Line currently are, and should remain, corresponding primarily to the 'hero timeline' as their information is almost entirely derived from Hero. The question is, do articles such as William Adama assume his tenure on Valkyrie happened 6 BCH (which makes big assumptions about the state of the Cylons, and also means that the Stealthstar incident occurred before' humaniod cylons were violating the line) or kinda pretend it didn't happen at all? We could make the text deliberately vague about the actual timeline and then add: "There are conflicting sources on how long Adama spent on Galactica before the Cylon Holocaust, see Hero timeline discontinuity" or similar notes where relevant in the main text to make it clear. OTW 09:00, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
I don't see the problem in moving the date and footnoting it, explaining that we chose to ignore the date given in "Hero" in favor of a lot of other onscreen evidence. If we kept the "three years" in the main text, we'd need to make a footnote anyways to stay consistent. So there is not much of a difference either way. The Valkyrie page in particular needs to be changed because it says that Tyrol and Gaeta served there with Adama.
Moreover, moving "Hero" a few years earlier actually gives Adama's doubts about his role in the conflict more weight. --Serenity 09:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
This sounds good to me, OTW. --April Arcus 10:18, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
Good to see someone bringing this up. I to have been cringing every time I read that Tyrol and Gaeta came with Adama from the Valkyrie as a way of reconcilling that. It just doesn't happen in the militaries that RDM and Co. use for inspiration. I like OTW's idea, that would work pretty well, as long as we cleary spell out the differences, maybe include a link to a section of the Hero or Timeline page that deals with it. --Talos 13:30, 21 October 2007 (CDT)

Vote

Ok, there are several possibilities on how to address this. Maybe we should just vote instead of having a long discussion. There are two sections 1/2 and a/b which complement each other. One is what to write, the other is how. So vote on 1 or 2 and a or b.

Option 1

Leave the dates as they are and just note the discrepancy in a footnote and either option a or b.

Option 2

Change the dates (except in the "Hero" summary) on pages like this one, William Adama, Daniel Novacek, Stealthstar and Valkyrie to 6BCH/"eight years ago" as per the dossier and earlier dialogue evidence, thus considering "Hero" dialogue an error. Then footnote that as per option a or b to explain that decision.

  • Support As said, I don't think it's in any way logical to accept dialogue just because it came later even though it's clearly wrong. We don't just go by a 2-second prop, but by earlier dialogue as well. If you disagree, I think option 1 is a fair alternative that preserves some of the status quo. --Serenity 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support Serenity said it all, don't have anything to add here but that I agree. --Talos 16:35, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support Just because the show is inconsistent doesn't mean that we he have to be. As long as we document our assumptions clearly (so that the reader knows exactly what info is coming from where) I don't think it's misleading or too presumptive. The alternative is a set of pages that says "A", a set of pages that says "not A", and then a bunch of footnotes pointing to the discrepancies. It reads smoother just to say "A" (or "not A") and then note the particular places that didn't jive. --Steelviper 23:04, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support I agree with Steelviper that we should try to keep as much intra-article consistency as possible. Since there are two versions of the timeline, we mention the most logical one (6BCH) in the article body, while noting the alternative (1BCH) in a footnote. If we run into any new timeline discontinuities, we should act in the same way. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:10, 23 October 2007 (CDT)

Option a

Create an own page similar to Season two timeline discontinuity which contains an explanation with earlier dialogue evidence and can be linked to. This prevents lengthy and duplicate footnotes on every page.

Option b

Put a section at the beginning of Hero#Analysis which can be linked to. Also prevents duplicate footnotes

  • Support I think this is the easiest solution. I'm against an own article as the issue is relatively small and can easily be explained in the episode article. --Serenity 16:20, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support Agreed, this would be easiest and the least intrusive way of doing this. --Talos 16:36, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support Simpler is better. A discontinuity article is going to have very low visibility (in terms of being searched/accessed). A footnote in a higher visibility article gives the information a wider audience, and it is easier to find (so long as the footnote is located within a logical article). --Steelviper 22:59, 22 October 2007 (CDT)
    • Comment I meant mainly where to store the overall information (in an own article or on the "Hero" page). I'd create a footnote behind every mention of the date. Like "While "Hero" places the date at 1 BCH, this conflicts with earlier dialogue. For a detailed analysis see..." --Serenity 06:49, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Support Since this discontinuity isn't as big and doesn't span as many episodes as the S2 one does, it doesn't have to be in its own article. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 09:05, 23 October 2007 (CDT)


"Scattered" re-re-re-visted

Sorry to beat this dead horse again. Since we're now taking the dossier at face value, I've tried to change all dates to it. In general it fits, but it places Adama's reinstatement into the Fleet at 23 BCH and his assignment to Atlantia at 17 BCH. For the Tigh/Adama meeting we go by the podcast note that the meeting took place 20 years ago. Is there anything that says we have to take this literally and can't place it at 23 BCH? And then assume that Adama re-joined the Fleet in the same year? In fact the 23-year date is used on Carolanne Adama, so the timeline isn't consistent with our other articles.

And what's the source for placing Tigh's reinstatement two years later? I know this is mentioned in the Tigh article, but it's not directly from the episode I think. Going by the Saul Tigh footnotes, it seems to come solely from the BSG magazine. Also, as it is now, it doesn't make sense that Adama got assigned to Atlantia with the rank of major 11 BCH. Because we know that he's a major when he gets Tigh back into the Fleet.

We could change it to this:

  • 23 BCH:
    • Adama and Tigh meet
    • Adama reinstated into the Fleet in the same year (so noted in dossier: 54-31=23)
  • 17 BCH:
    • Adama assigned to Atlantia makes his thousands landing (AoC), gets promoted to major
    • Gets Tigh back into the fleet.

The only point I'm unsure is the time between Adama's and Tigh's reinstatement and the quoted two years. The dossier says "Major: Battlestar Atlantia". Maybe that means he was a major on Atlantia, not that he was promoted to the rank on it. --Serenity 09:21, 25 October 2007 (CDT)

The document is unfortunately only a short list of Adama's accomplishments in the fleet. It would seem to me, although I'm not certain, that the list is only comprehensive to the point of reassignments, not promotions. In the Navy, it is equally common for an officer to be promoted aboard ship as well as with reassignment, although for higher level positions (such as Commander and Captain), it is increasingly more likely to recieve promotion with reassignment. So I always assumed that Adama was recommissioned as a major, although there's not really any proof of that is there (which begs the question, what was he doing for those six years?). This episode is a continuity nightmare by the way.--OrionFour 14:59, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
He was recommissioned as captain and Viper pilot. That's said explicitly in a deleted scene from "Scattered". The dossier doesn't really contradict on screen information as such, as "Scattered" is pretty vague about dating. We have the "20 years" from the podcast, but that can easily be a rounded value. As said, the two years between Adama's and Tigh's reinstatement comes from the magazine I think, but we usually treat that as "valid until contradicted". So we could either extend that period to 6 years, or we could keep it as two years and assume that Adama got promoted earlier (at the moment I'm favoring that).
This probably comes down to simple choice unless someone recalls some more information. So we could decide on one, and footnote the alternative. Probably the best way. --Serenity 16:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
My reading is that Adama serves on the tramp freighter from -37 BCH to some point prior to -23 BCH (per the dossier). He meets Tigh in -28 BCH (per "Torn", in which Adama calls Tigh "The man that I've known for the past thirty years"). He is recomissioned in -23 BCH, rank unknown. Tigh is recomissioned in -21 BCH (two years later, per the magazine), by which point Adama holds the rank of major (per the cut scene in "Scattered"). The dossier entry for -17 BCH indicates his transfer to Atlantia, not a promotion. His thousandth landing (on Atlantia, per "Act of Contrition") must take place shortly afterwards.
We can date Adama's marriage to Carolanne as follows: Zak dies in -2 BCH (Miniseries). He probably graduated from some kind of military academy, which would make his age at least 22 following the U.S. model. That puts his birth at roughly -24 BCH. From Adama's photo with his two sons, Lee looks about two years older, putting his birth in -26 BCH.
So, I think everything makes perfect sense here. The flashbacks in "Scattered" span seven years from -28 BCH (Adama and Tigh's first meeting) to -21 BCH (Tigh's reinstatement). Adama's comment about meeting Tigh 30 years ago in Torn fits nicely. He probably married Carolanne in -26 BCH, at which point he would have quit his job on the freighter to start a family, and resumed military service three years later, when Zak was old enough to leave with one parent. The only date that has to be fudged is Moore's comment that the "Scattered" flashbacks take place 20 years ago, and this is both the most vague and least reliable piece of information that we have to consider. --April Arcus 18:55, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
That sounds good :) I agree that we shouldn't necessarily take behind-the-scenes info over on-screen evidence. Though it can be made fit either way.
Two comments though: First, Adama's rank is known from a deleted scene. He starts as captain as well. Second, Adama didn't quit his job with marriage. When he gets the news that he is reinstated, Tigh states "the new wife pulled through". And the two are still on the freighter. The Adamas married while he was a freight monkey and then he joined the Fleet rightaway. --Serenity 01:29, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
Nice analysis, all. If we take the "twenty years ago" as a vague statement that could also mean 23 years, Peter's reading fits pretty much perfectly (adjusting it for what Serenity pointed out above, of course). --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 05:57, 26 October 2007 (CDT)
Well, right now we have the meeting at 28 years. We could also place it at 23 years and assume that Adama got recommissioned in the same year. Both versions work, but 28 years fits better with the line that they've known each other for 30 years. This part of the timeline isn't such a mess as some make it out to be. The only major reshuffling is the Valkyrie mission.
Also regarding Tyrol's "ten years" comment. That might be a rounded value - people often think in 10, 15, 20 years - so I put that as "circa". --Serenity 06:37, 26 October 2007 (CDT)

Ancient History

  • 4,000 years BCH: The Thirteenth Tribe reportedly leaves the planet Kobol, later leaving a beacon in space and building the Temple of Five (The Eye of Jupiter)[1]. At some undated point, something travels from Earth to Kobol, passing on information about Earth, including a map of its night sky.

This would be clearer if these 3 items were seperated. The virus on the beacon is an exact match of a virus reported 3000 years ago. This is a major clue in the series and should be given more importance as opposed to being mentioned in passing the way its written here. Also it need to be specified that the Temple is *radio carbon* dated to 4000 years.

Quote Adama to Roslin "According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol"

Quote Tyrol to Adama "Our initial radio carbon dating suggests the temples at least 4000 years old which lines up with the exodus of the 13th tribe"

This is potentially confusing since the exodus of the 13th tribe is anything from 3000-4000 years ago (if 13th tribe and 13th colony are to taken as the same thing!). The virus itsself adds more confusion, since it was an exact match then the assumption is that its the same virus since a virus will mutate pretty fast but you would think that in space it is in suspended animation. Therefore its not entirely clear that this quote is saying the beacon is 3000 years old

Since the "undated" fact is undated, it should be moved outside of the timeline but still within the Ancient History section or preferentially removed entirely since it borders speculation.

I would suggest that it reads as follows...

  • 4000 years BCH: The Temple of Five is built by the 13th tribe [1]
  • 4000 - 3000 years BCH: The 13th tribe/colony leaves Kobol [1] [2]
  • After 3000 years BCH: The beacon is left behind by the 13th colony [2]

The [1], [2] points to the two quotes listed above.

Its not exactly clear in which order these occured but it represents the facts as we know them. It is very important that this timeline is listed as clearly as possible since it may well be one of the most crucial bits of information in the show. Although it is commonly assumed that the 13th tribe left Kobol, left a beacon and then built the temple it is not clear from these 2 quotes that this is the correct order of events. You can create other orders based on these quotes so I think its important that preconceptions aren't written into the description of events and the ordering of these events is left up to the reader - as the show intended. --Swozie 16:21, 4 January 2008 (CST)

How crucial it is depends on one's preferences. Mine are entirely elsewhere. Anyways, that's what footnotes are for. It's true that it should be left somewhat open, and it's a topic that was always unclear, but it has to be put in some order for the purpose of the article. Footnotes can give the sources and some explanation, so that the reader can decide what to make of it. They can't be too long, but 1-3 sentences are usually enough to convey the information. I changed it to make the beacon date more ambiguous, but that's said in the footnote. --Serenity 18:59, 4 January 2008 (CST)

12tribes leaving Kobol 2000 years ago is wrong...

Billy: Uh, well, we won't know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. Elosha: That's around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol. --Swozie 19:54, 5 January 2008 (CST)

There are many contradictory quotes on that one. There is a quote that says 2,000 years (you mentioned it), there is one that says 3,000 and one that says 4,000. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 03:57, 6 January 2008 (CST)

Its only a contradiction if you make the assumption that the 13th tribe left only once - also nobody has ever said that there was only ever 1 thirteeth colony. Although its never been stated, the modern day cylons themselves are obviously a 13th colony/tribe since they have their own homeworld.

Billy: Uh, well, we won't know for sure until they send a ground team but the initial estimates have it, uh, o­n the order of approximately 2,000 years. Elosha: That's around the time the 13 tribes first left Kobol.

Notice the use of the term "first", also 13 tribes left Kobol, they aren't neccessarily saying the the legendary "Thirteeth Tribe" was one of them.

Adama: Why the Scroll of Pythia? Roslin: Pythia is supposed to have chronicled the original journey of the 13th Tribe o­n its way to Earth.

Notice the use of the term "original" - if there was only one journey then this term would have no meaning and therefore would be pointless to include it.

Adama: According to Cottle, the virus was an exact match to one reported over 3000 years ago, right around the time that the 13th colony left Kobol"

Chief: Our initial radiocarbon dating suggests that the temple's at least 4,000 years old, which lines up with the exodus of the Thirteenth Tribe. --Swozie 07:43, 6 January 2008 (CST)

The 13th Tribe "first left Kobol" 2,000 years ago, but also left 3,000 and 4,000 years ago? Now that's a contradiction... --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 08:06, 6 January 2008 (CST)
Yep. There is a deliberate retcon or dialogue error somewhere; or both. It's possible to reconcile two of the three dates; for example by assuming that part of them left Kobol earlier to build the temple and that the rest left later with the other tribes. But the third will contradict each two you chose. Taking all the dialogue literally and reconciling all three dates is impossible without some serve mental contortions. --Serenity 08:31, 6 January 2008 (CST)

They don't say the 13th tribe left 2000 years ago, they say 13 tribes left. Sorry to keep banging on about the same point and to a certain extent I am inclined to believe its an error of some kind, more likely the history of the colonies has been changed by the writers before season 3 but I don't believe its a script error since Boomer says the same thing...

Boomer: I'm putting together a lot of pieces from a lot of sources beyond your scriptures. If I'm right, that's the spot where your god supposedly stood and watched Athena throw herself down o­nto the rocks below out of despair over the exodus of the 13 tribes.

Even at that point in the series it was clear that the exodus of 13 tribes resulted in 12 colonies (on Kobol pre miniseries, later changed to 12 planets). So the writers knew that there were 12 colonies and yet twice they say 13 tribes left Kobol. --Swozie 07:15, 7 January 2008 (CST)

Well, with the first twelve populating the colonies, and the 13th going in their own direction. The (legendary) 13th tribe was one of the tribes. The only reason they're legendary (and not just a plain old tribe) is that they went in a different direction and the rest of the tribes (now colonies) lost track of them. The exodus of the 13 tribes would coincide with the exodus of the 13th tribe. It looks like the exodus was a single event... they just can't seem to keep their dates straight (whether it's 2, 3 or 4K years). --Steelviper 07:31, 7 January 2008 (CST)

RON MOORE COMMENTARY 8/26/2005 -- This notion of the constellations is something that I came up with. I wanted to connect it to our present day mythology of the Zodiac. The show is replete with symbols and references to Zodiacal things. Somehow, these names for these Colonies are not random, there is a connection, and here's the connection. That these people of the thirteenth tribe looked up into the sky and made up these constellations and assigned them to their brethren, the lost tribes. (source: The Home, Part II podcast)

You can't read much into Adama's 3000 year quote since he says "over 3000" years and he is talking about a virus, not exactly the beacon and since its unknown how the virus behaves in space, how long it takes to mutate into something different and even how long it took for the 13th tribe to get to the LionHeads nebula you can't really say anything for sure about how this fits into the timeline.

You also agree that at some point "someone" travelled from Earth to Kobol therefore the most obvious solution, which assumes no script errors is as follows

4000 years: Exodus of 13th tribe who then built the Temple

  1. Got to Earth
  2. Named the constellations after their "lost" brothers
  3. Went back to Kobol, with information on the Temple and the constellation map

2000 years: The "reunited" 13 tribes left Kobol to form 12 colonies

Surely this is the correct way to read the storyline. It makes no assumptions, requires no errors in the script, has no contradictions and interpets the quotes *exactly* as written.

Your just getting confused with "13th tribe" which reference one tribe, and "13 tribes" which references all 13.

--Swozie 07:37, 7 January 2008 (CST)

Except that if it happened that way, then the knowledge of where the 13th tribe went would be with the twelve colonies (since people who had been to earth would be among the twelve colonies). The tribes always have seemed to correspond to the colonies, so having a thirteenth in the mix would upset the pattern. What's really affecting my thinking (and likely the thinking of others) is the way the exodus pattern unfolded in TOS. --Steelviper 08:24, 7 January 2008 (CST)

The knowledge IS with the 12 colonies, the constellation map, the knowledge of the Temple, the chronicle of the original journey also bear in mind that when the 13th colony got to Earth, the other 12 tribes were (according to RON MOORE) considered "lost" --Swozie 08:29, 7 January 2008 (CST)

This timeline seems to make sense. Maybe we should try asking Brad or MrsRon whether this timeline is correct and there were actually 2 exoduses. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 08:58, 7 January 2008 (CST)

"Lost Time", and other notes...

I think we should really note that there are various "lost time" events (i.e. "Flight of the Phoenix", "Downloaded", and even those inferred by "He That Believeth In Me") that we should note. Further, I think it would be wise to point out that there might be inaccuracies in this timeline that can never be rectified due to the lack of definitive information. Thoughts? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I thought "Downloaded" was cleared up on the DVD release? --April Arcus 03:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

BCE occurences

This search gives 10 occurences of the BCE style, all of them in infoboxes on characters making it to Earth.

Sure the series ends with the note that all these events are supposed to be in the distant past from our perspective, culminating in the long-past settlement of our planet.

However, shouldn't at least the infoboxes if not the articles alltogether remain within the confines of the series chronology, i.e. use BCH?

Also, there is a spoiler problem. By adding BCE to all these infoboxes, all these articles give away that Galactica cannot be finding our contemporary earth.

Finally, the date in question - and note it's the same date on every page is purely an estimation. Str1977 09:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

We should not be using BCE at all, since there is nothing that states that the Colonial Calendar lines up exactly with the Earth calendar. Please remember that the Earth calendar has been revised several times in human history, so we've never had a consistent calendar to begin with anyway. As there is no direct correlation between an Earth year being the same as a Colonial year, and as such we should keep all times in BCH (Before Colonial Holocaust) or ACH (After Colonial Holocaust). -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 14:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well, there is a link between the two systems as the ending of the series is .... years before our present. But that is revealed only in the last few moments of the show and should not form the basis for dates given here. It does make more sense to say Lee Adama died x years after the Cylon holocaust.
That the Earth calendar (actually is not one Earth calendar) has been revised is of no consequence however, as a) it makes little no differences to the years, b) BC is merely our present Gregorian calendar calculated backwards. Str1977 15:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
That is the only link. There is nothing that supports a direct correlation between how the Colonial calendar works and the Earth calendar (i.e. a Colonial year could be 380 days or more, as seems to be supported by Caprica occuring only 50 years before the Fall and not the 52-53 needed, if we're going by the 4,571 days that the First Cylon War took). And yes, the calendar has been modified since its inception as we learn more about the rotation of our planet and other factors, and there are vast differences between the two calendars that cause discrepancies. Just look at the Julian calendar versus the Gregorian calendar. Since we do not know what the discrepancy is between the Colonial calendar and the Second Earth (our real-life) calendar, we should just do away with the whole BCE thing in terms of the BSG universe, since it adds a level of error and complication we do not need. This is something that I honestly do not believe that RDM will ever explain, since that's not how RDM really works at all. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 18:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
We are basically on the same side on the actual issue: do away with BCE.
We only disagree about little things you said or rather about their relevance to this issue. As I said, there is no "the Calendar" on earth. Earth rotation only commands the day and that has been pretty much stable.
I agree that is probably a discrepancy between year-lengths and day-length if directly compared to ours. TOS was certainly more "realistic" on that account.
Back to the issue: can you suggest a ACH wording to replace the current BCE one. Str1977 09:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'll go even further.... There's no reason to note they died at all, since that's really a given and there were no special circumstances to their death. There really is no reason to use "died sometime after XXX ACH" in the infobox at all, since you would have to do that to every infobox for every character who survived up to the arrived at the new Earth. We should really leave the death section of infoboxes for confirmed deaths, not assumed. However, that's a topic for another talk page. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually you are right. After all, the whole Wiki variously works under the "state as of the last episode" mode, talking about deceased characters - but from the perspective of 150,000 years later all would be deceased. Str1977 08:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely. The only definitive evidence of anyone actually dying is Hera Agathon! All the other deaths should be logically assumed, barring some extremely odd and supernatural event. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 20:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
These are supposed to be 150,000 Earth years, aren't they? That's the time given in the article Ron is reading. -- Noneofyourbusiness 17:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
So this is how the 148,000 BC numberes originates: 150,000 years minus 2,000 years.
My proposal is change the current text to "died after the settlement of New Earth in ... ACH".
How many years after the Cylon Holocaust does the series end? Our season timelines (which actually are not timelines at all) do not help in this. The best estimation I have is based on a comment during the mutinty, which talks about "fighting the Cylons for four years" - that this fits with the four seasons is probably no coincidence.
So how about "died after the settlement of New Earth in 4 ACH?"
Str1977 09:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The BSG timeline is wonky and wrought with various contradictions; Tom Zarek made a reference for "five years" in Season 4, there's that one year gaffe in "Hero", and "Caprica" (along with "Razor") introduces some delightfully fun inconsistencies of their own. As I said earlier, I'm not fond of noting deaths in infoboxes unless absolutely confirmed. We can assume that every one of the 38,000+ survivors (or, indeed, anyone else in the series) is well dead, buried and rotted to nothing after the 150,000 jump. This being the case, we can either make a carte blanche note that everyone died sometime after the discovery of the Second Earth (which is easy enough to do directly in the infobox's syntax itself), or simply leave the field blank in the infobox. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 20:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Real-world events within the timeline?

Since RDM has clearly stated on more than one occasion that the events of BSG lead to us in the real world, how do we handle real-life history within the confines of the timeline? For example, Admiral Adama scattered the survivors throughout the world at the end of "Daybreak, Part II." Real-life science and archaeology shows us that humans did not originate in or settle in any of those areas (except for the African area, where the survivors landed) 150,000 years ago. As such, should we make it clear in the articles that these survivors died out very quickly? Keeping with real-world history, that's precisely what would have taken place. (And their remains must've been rapidly devoured and scattered to bits by the local fauna!)

The same applies with Hera being described as Mitochondrial Eve, the MRCA. This is factually incorrect, as the MRCA existed much more recently than 150k years ago (more like between 10k and 50k years ago). Also, Mitochondrial Eve would be the most recent common matrilineal ancestor, anyway, not the MRCA. They're two different things.

I ask this because with any other science fiction series, it's all within an internal timeline, not connected to the real world. However, as I said, RDM has stated that the point of the show was to connect with the real world.

So...how should this be handled? I hope I made sense. Thanks in advance for your input... -- Liquidcross 01:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hmm. It's obviously not exactly like the real world. I think things where we don't know exactly what happened don't need mentioning. However likely something like "this settlement died out" may be, it's still speculative. There's no pressing need to fill in the part of the timeline between the penultimate and final scenes of Daybreak. -- Noneofyourbusiness 14:58, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Concur with Noneofyourbusiness. I do think that noting the facts that Liquidcross pointed out in the "notes" section or as references would suffice. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 16:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply