Template talk:TOS/Archive1

Committal

Well, DrWho42 is going down the "ask forgiveness and not permission" route in using the template. It's been active on several pages without any issue I know of, so should we greenlight this now? (The Doctor's working faster than any bot right now). --Spencerian 14:34, 27 May 2007 (CDT)

I personally haven't noticed any issues with this template in Firefox 2.0. Is anyone with IE, Safari, Opera, Konqueror, etc. experiencing any issues? --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 14:44, 27 May 2007 (CDT)

Works good in Safari. I'd added it to quite a few pages a while ago, and I think it's good to go for everywhere. --BklynBruzer 18:31, 27 May 2007 (CDT)

It doesn't render well in IE 6... Unsurprisingly, much to my chagrin... Freakin' party pooper. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 21:18, 27 May 2007 (CDT)

How about IE7? --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 01:38, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

Haven't loaded that on my XP test PC yet... -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 03:07, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

I have IE 7. The logo is nearly center over the Bird. It appears fine. --Spencerian 07:37, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

Galactica 1980 and TOS Separate continuity

So no TOS to be tagged on those articles? They're still much more related to the Battlestar Galactica than RDM, so I don't see the tag hurting the article (i.e. for Classic Battlestar Galactica 1). DrWho42 12:50, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

It's something to discuss. When we developed the separate continuity policy we didn't factor 1980 in as we consider it canonical. But, it's not TOS, either, per se. The comics and books might be fine with the special flag, but we should get a bit more input from others, so hold off on using the tag on sep-con TOS material for the moment. --Spencerian 14:59, 28 May 2007 (CDT)