Battlestar Wiki talk:Requests for adminship/Catrope: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:35, 23 July 2007

Minimum number of votes?

Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --Serenity 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --Spencerian 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

Who's allowed to vote?

Who is allowed to vote for something like this? Anyone?--Veepz 12:35, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 ::I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
+== Who's allowed to vote? ==
+Who is allowed to vote for something like this? Anyone?--[[User:Veepz|Veepz]] 12:35, 23 July 2007 (CDT)