Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for May 2007

The Twelve Colonies (RDM)

• Support. Recent edits added (the pictures, mainly) make this article stand out more, in addition to standardizations by others beforehand. Considering we haven't any captures available of other colonies, it works well enough. --Spencerian 07:47, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support Good and informative article in general. --Serenity 08:15, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Neutral This a good article, however, I'm voting for Delphi this time. Would gladly support another time. JubalHarshaw 11:44, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Neutral Definitely worthy of FA status, in my view, but I'm waiting to see whether or not Delphi gets the appropriate love before casting a support vote for this article. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 09:38, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support Very informative and well-written. --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 12:12, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose Not good enough, in my opinion. --BklynBruzer 13:49, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose Needs to be "condised" more. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 16:21, 20 May 2007 (CDT)

Tricia Helfer

• Oppose. Who can say "nay" to Tricia? I have to, as the article still has minor voicing problems and doesn't quite stand out to me as much as Audrey Landers did. I think there are better biographies. --Spencerian 07:47, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose Nothing special. --Serenity 08:15, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose Not even a Quality Article. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 09:34, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
• Neutral What a babe. Shane ^{(T - C - E)}

Basestar (RDM)

• Comment I like this article from a technical standpoint, although there may be some formatting adjustments or better screencaps needed there. --Spencerian 07:47, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose Too much of a listing of encounters with the Fleet. Not enough information. Or rather, it's overshadowed by retelling. Without getting all technical, there could be more pictures of the basestar interior. --Serenity 08:15, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose Really needs much more love, in addition to interior pictures. Also, I imagine that once we learn more about that "Life Aboard a Basestar" book RDM wrote for the actors, the article would see a definite improvement. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 09:37, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose To much technical. No real juice on why Basestar's are important. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 16:21, 20 May 2007 (CDT)

Delphi

• Support This article was well written, and needed just an additional picture or two to make it work. A suitable and not-often-seen article that should get attention. --Spencerian 08:10, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support Looks interesting too, and as said, a topic that isn't brought up often. Would be a change from the usual suspects --Serenity 08:15, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support Interesting article. I like it. --BklynBruzer 08:29, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support per Serenity. JubalHarshaw 11:42, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support While it has excellent content, the article seems to jump to different points and therefore is incongruent. (The progression of information presented in the article is done by episode, for instance, when it really should be by the unique aspects of Delphi. For instance, the Cylons act of resettlement of Delphi is mentioned at the beginning and at the end of the article, almost as if the point had not been mentioned before.) A refactoring of content is in order before this reaches FA level. Given the recent work on the article, the article does read much better, and is worthy of FA status. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 09:29, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
  • Comment I re-structured the article. It's now closer to what you suggested and indeed better. --Serenity 07:20, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
• Support Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 16:21, 20 May 2007 (CDT)