Sounds like a plan. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 06:30, 11 October 2006 (CDT)
As always, I don't like measuring "useful" edits vs. non-useful ones. We should have a single standard for page moves, article patroling, etc. --April Arcus 11:11, 11 October 2006 (CDT)
Vote
- Date Started: Saturday, October 14, 2006 at 12:00 (UTC)
- Date Ending: Saturday, October 21, 2006 at 12:00 (UTC)
- Joe Beaudoin Jr. -
Oppose I didn't see the harm in this, but I really don't see how it's particularly helpful either. I'm beginning to personally think that we're in danger of going overboard with this sort of thing; we're not Wikipedia, and we have no need to be Wikipedia either. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 18:35, 14 October 2006 (CDT) - CalculatinAvatar -
- Day -
- Mercifull - Oppose i dont really feel a need for this. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 09:04, 15 October 2006 (CDT)
- April Arcus -
- Shane -
Support --Shane (T - C - E) 18:14, 14 October 2006 (CDT) - Spencerian - Oppose. Sounds like we're making sub-admins. That's what a contributor is. --Spencerian 09:29, 15 October 2006 (CDT)
- Steelviper -
- <Your Vote Here>
Really like another look @ this
With Season 4 coming up, we could have another flux of off site visitors, and using the "Patrolled" check, would really help use not have to double up on work. Granted, most sysops have this ability already, but a core group of regular non-sysops should have access to this as well. Any more thoughts? Shane (T - C - E) 23:43, 1 November 2007 (CDT)
- Hmm. We do seem to be seeing a new influx of users who are actually beginning to contribute, particularly with "Razor", though it isn't to the point where we are overwhelmed. Still, I'd like to see what editing activity "Razor" brings before we consider this in any depth. At least, that's my opinion anyway. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 00:06, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
- I say we give the patrol and autopatrol rights to the trusted group as well. The technical possibilities to save a lot of work are there, and I agree with Shane that we should use them. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 10:29, 2 November 2007 (CDT)