Minimum number of votes?
Few people seem to have noticed this RFA, as demonstrated by the low number of votes (2 at the time of writing). This raised a technical question in my mind: is there a minimum amount of votes? Is 2/0/0 considered consensus? IMO it shouldn't be. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 08:05, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
- I've noticed this too. Maybe we can just extend the deadline another week or so. Vote, bitches! --Serenity 08:16, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
- Definitely extend the vote. I'll add something to the blog. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 08:51, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
- I've taken the personal preference that a bureaucrat should chime in last, but I did note the RFA. I'll add my vote in a few days. --Spencerian 12:13, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
- Since Spence mentioned it... To be honest, I made it a point never to vote in RFAs, since I've always felt that the community should be the one to decide who is an administrator without any needling from me either way. This was borne out of the fact that I was the only bureaucrat for a while, and thus the one who would "knight" the administrator. That is, until the dawn of
the SS... *ahem* I mean, Shane and Spence. ;-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 23:23, 23 July 2007 (CDT)- I've always felt that the community should be the one to decide
- You're part of the community too, Joe, and I for one welcome your vote (not just in RFAs, anything, really) as much as anyone else's. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 17:15, 29 July 2007 (CDT)
Who's allowed to vote?
Who is allowed to vote for something like this? Anyone?--Veepz 12:35, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
- See BW:RFA. Basically, after 30 days, anyone can vote. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 12:37, 23 July 2007 (CDT)