| |||||
Chiefs' noticeboard |
---|
Daily Visit |
Quick Links |
Important Tags |
This noticeboard is a location to discuss and coordinate administrative tasks for the Battlestar Wiki.
It is my hope that this place can serve as a location for administrators to coordinate their efforts on the maintenance tasks of the Wiki (it's not ALL fun and games), as well as a spot for our contributors to be able to bring things to the attention of the admins if something needs to be done. Need a protected page edited? An article or picture deleted? Admins will watchlist this page so that your request won't get lost in the shuffle.
Current Administrators[edit]
Bureaucrats[edit]
Bureaucrats are administrators who have the ability to make other users into administrators. Currently Bureaucrats are:
Sysops[edit]
Sysops are administrators who have access to move, delete and restore pages as well as blocking malicious users. The current administrators are:
See list of all admins on Battlestar Wiki
Javascript Reported Vandals[edit]
No recent reports.
Username policy template update[edit]
After a minor issue involving one user's page, I've revised the {{username}} policy template so that it serves two roles. If admins encounter a username that's inappropriate:
- Add {{username}} to the top of the user's home account page.
- Unless the remaining content of the user's page is in violation of other policies, do NOT make any further changes to the user's home page.
- Add a new topic to the user's talk page explaining the issue and give them an appropriate time to request a change per the username policy, or note the account is banned if a significant violation.
The new template works for either scenario without having to add any other items to a user page. --Spencerian 11:55, 2 July 2007 (CDT)
BS Wiki pimped at SyFyPortal[edit]
Not sure if this is the right place to put it, but we got mentioned and linked to in an article over there, about the apparent appearance of the Demetrius in Season 4. Also contains an interesting spoiler about the Centurions, btw. --Serenity 12:39, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- Actually, Michael Hinman (operator of SyFy Portal) e-mailed me just yesterday to let me know. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 13:18, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
User:Sssjhnmh is up to no good[edit]
Sssjhnmh recently edited the page Angela. He left hundreds of the same links to an very inappropriate url. He should be banned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veepz (talk • contribs).
Nevermind, Catrope took care of it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veepz (talk • contribs).
- Done. Thanks for the heads-up! :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 15:11, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, sorry I forgot about the sig, guess I was in a rush. Veepz 15:14, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- No worries. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 15:15, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
I think we're lucky that we get so few people like this. --BklynBruzer 16:14, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- Indeed. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 16:21, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- It's interesting to note it got through the CAPTCA tho. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 17:45, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- What is the CAPTCA?Veepz 17:52, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- See: Captcha. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 17:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- It was probably an actual person. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 17:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- Most likely, but the Cylons may be onto us. --Steelviper 20:45, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- That's some bad news. --BklynBruzer 22:07, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- It's nothing new, sadly, and much expected (though unwanted). It's like an arms race: one side outdoing the other, vice versa, and rinse & repeat. Most of the captcha crackers seem to be of the human variety, who are paid off by people in the form of free pornography and the like. (Some of the weaker captchas are easier to crack, because they have a standard font they use, and they do the manipulations rigidly.) Otherwise, if it can be implemented, it can be circumvented. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 22:19, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- The good ol' "One side gets a better gun, the other gets better armor," eh? --BklynBruzer 22:26, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- "if it can be implemented, it can be circumvented." - the bottom line. There will always be people who would rather disrupt and destroy, rather than improve and create. Any idiot can destroy. JubalHarshaw 09:51, 10 July 2007 (CDT)
- The good ol' "One side gets a better gun, the other gets better armor," eh? --BklynBruzer 22:26, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- It's nothing new, sadly, and much expected (though unwanted). It's like an arms race: one side outdoing the other, vice versa, and rinse & repeat. Most of the captcha crackers seem to be of the human variety, who are paid off by people in the form of free pornography and the like. (Some of the weaker captchas are easier to crack, because they have a standard font they use, and they do the manipulations rigidly.) Otherwise, if it can be implemented, it can be circumvented. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 22:19, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- That's some bad news. --BklynBruzer 22:07, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- Most likely, but the Cylons may be onto us. --Steelviper 20:45, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- What is the CAPTCA?Veepz 17:52, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
- It's interesting to note it got through the CAPTCA tho. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 17:45, 9 July 2007 (CDT)