Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/The Merovingian (3): Difference between revisions

From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
(The Homeworld supports The Merovingian for adminship)
(→‎[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]]: correcting vote count (I keep forgetting that myself.))
Line 3: Line 3:


'''[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/The Merovingian (3)|action=edit}} Vote here] '''
'''[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Battlestar Wiki:Requests for adminship/The Merovingian (3)|action=edit}} Vote here] '''
'''(4/0/0) ending <nowiki>05:36</nowiki> {{{Ending}}} (UTC)'''
'''(6/0/0) ending <nowiki>05:36</nowiki> {{{Ending}}} (UTC)'''


{{User|The Merovingian}} – The Merovingian's history with us has not been entirely smooth. During his first months with us, his unmatched energy and enthusiasm for the project were sadly tempered with an impatience and quickness to anger which did not recommend him for adminship.
{{User|The Merovingian}} – The Merovingian's history with us has not been entirely smooth. During his first months with us, his unmatched energy and enthusiasm for the project were sadly tempered with an impatience and quickness to anger which did not recommend him for adminship.

Revision as of 10:31, 30 July 2006

The Merovingian

Back to RFA.

Vote here (6/0/0) ending 05:36 {{{Ending}}} (UTC)

The Merovingian (talk • contribs) – The Merovingian's history with us has not been entirely smooth. During his first months with us, his unmatched energy and enthusiasm for the project were sadly tempered with an impatience and quickness to anger which did not recommend him for adminship.

In the last few months, his demeanor has improved drastically, and he has acquired a remarkable maturity and level-headedness. This track record was unfortunately marred by an incident three months ago, involving a series of attacks against fan reporter Jim Iaccino, a.k.a. "KoenigRules". The results of this were such that I was forced to oppose his last nomination for adminship - despite his recently improved behavior, I felt he needed to demonstrate that he was capable of adhering to higher standards on a permanent basis.

It is my opinion that Merv has done so. He now makes persuasive arguments in rational tones, he appeals and defers to group consensus when appropriate, and he has been helpful and patient with new users.

Merv has always been a contributor of the highest order. As one of the most serious and vocal opponents of his adminship in the past, it is my pleasure to state my belief that Merv has demonstrated the maturity and patience to wield admin privileges responsibly and effectively. I would be honored to work alongside him as an administrator. --Peter Farago 00:37, 28 July 2006 (CDT)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

  1. Support as nominator. --Peter Farago 00:37, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
  2. Support I am delighted to support, based both on absolutely superb contributions and behavior that has steadily improved to its currently decorous state. --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 04:18, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
  3. Support Has made excellent contributions in the last few weeks. --FrankieG 06:40, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
  4. Support. I feel gaining Peter's support after all this time is no mean feat. You've earned mine as well for the same criteria. With great power comes...well, you know the rest. Get your mop and bucket. --Spencerian 07:10, 28 July 2006 (CDT)
  5. Support I've been highly impressed with his contributions and such here recently. --Talos 13:05, 29 July 2006 (CDT)
  6. Support Merv was the second user to greet me when I came here. I was overzealous when I first arrived, but he helped me to temper myself through helpful suggestions that were not rude or even bossy. He's an excellent editor here and I couldn't think of a better choice for admin. --Homeworld616 01:33, 30 July 2006 (CDT)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What duties, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Battlestar Wiki:Project List's for a list of projects.
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions here, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.