Talk:Number One/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 21:13, 19 December 2006

Article name

I believe it should be Cavil, not Brother Cavil, same as it's Cally, not Specialist Cally.

Yep. --Peter Farago 19:20, 4 March 2006 (CST)

Cylon?

Just from speculation based on the 'not at any of the cylon meetings' line, which is so similar to Six's line.

Also if he is a cylon he could be 'Number 1,' as that so far the lower the number the higher the age of the cylon. Perhaps that makes him the 'leader', that is, if cylon's have leaders in their 'society based on unity'.

Just a guess--Antagonist 21:12, 7 March 2006 (CST)

I doubt he is Number 1. Plus, as people keep on forgetting, Cylons only appear to age -- they don't actually grow up from infancy like humans do. They're made as old as they look (or as young as they look). Period. I wouldn't be surprised if he was Number 12, thus sinking the whole "model number sorted by age" thing. -- Joe Beaudoin 17:47, 12 March 2006 (CST)

I agree, though I'll take it a step further and say that he is likely Number 12, and likely not Number 1. I think either we have not seen Number 1 yet in any form...or else Number 1 has been there from the beginning, and will be a big surprise for us. --Felix Culpa 12:52, 17 March 2006 (CST)

Do we know if both discovered models were named Cavil? Because that makes me suspicious that their discovery together wouldn't be accidental. And especially with how in agreement they were even after being separately for months (presumably). I don't trust their words, especially now that the Colony was subjugated. Rocky8311 12:42, 13 March 2006 (CST)

As far as I know, there's no on screen evidence of Caprica Cavil being called Cavil directly. We just call him "Caprica Cavil" for the sake of discerning the two different copies of that model, since we only know that model by Cavil. Hope that isn't as confusing as it reads... -- Joe Beaudoin 13:09, 13 March 2006 (CST)

Cavil and Cylon Aging

Regardless of whether or not the claim about preaching longer than Tyrol has been "sucking down oxygen" is correct, Cavil's apparent age (approximately 70, going by Dean Stockwell's real age) gives us some hints about the maturation of Humano-Cylons. It would be very safe to assume that the Cylons haven't been at this for a whole 70 years--otherwise, agents would probably have been introduced into Colonial society during the first war, instead of waiting for the second, and Baltar and Adama and every other survivor wouldn't have been surprised by the fact that they "look like us." A Humano-Cylon body, pre-download, seems to be either a) generated from scratch and resembling a particular age the moment it's ready (an instant twenty-something Sharon, early thirties Six, and late sixties/early seventies Cavil), or b) Cylon genes can be temporarily tweaked to accelerate an aging process that is usually human normal. Either way, the Cylons don't seem to spend 20-plus years generating a new body. Master geneticists that they are, why would they have to wait? -- BlueResistance 22:28, 18 March 2006 (EST).

I thought (a) was the clear implication of "Resurrection Ship, Part I" and "Downloaded" - new Cylon bodies come pre-aged. --Peter Farago 21:21, 18 March 2006 (CST)

Those technically weren't new bodies. They are copies, not clones, remember? A "new" body is exactly duplicated from an old one. By definition all will be the same age. So any aging would take place simultaneously across the whole model. Also, Dean Stockwell is ~70 but Cavil can be younger.--Noneofyourbusiness 23:11, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Are you suggesting there's a stock supply of uninhabited Cylon bodies all aging simultaneously, a la Evangelion? --Peter Farago 21:54, 18 March 2006 (CST)

Er, yes. That is what the Resurrection Ship (and whatever they have on their homeworld) is. My point is that when they make a new uninhabited body it's A Copy, Not A Clone, and thus the same age as the body it was copied from.--Noneofyourbusiness 23:41, 18 March 2006 (EST)

Every body in a Cylon model is the same. They are all twins, none is a clone of another. They are made in the resurrection Ship, that was visually implied by the whole stack of Sixes. The Cavils themeselves are proof that they are made the age they look. There are Cavils in pods looking exactly like they do. The "longer than.." comment was needed, he wouldn't say "I've been preaching for two years, since I'm a Cylon.." --Sauron18 19 March 2006

I removed the statement claiming that the humanoid cylons possibly came into existence thirty years prior to the time period in the show was contradicted by other evidence. It misunderstood the point of the previous statement (which I originally submitted), which does not argue that the infiltration of the colonies began that far back. It only suggests that the humanoid cylons came into being thirty or more years prior to the time of the series assuming Cavil was telling the truth about preaching longer than Tyrol had been sucking down oxygen. --Felix Culpa 23:38, 17 August 2006 (CDT)

How do we know Cylons even biologically age? They might have something that prevents that. Commander Mazien 18:37, 29 November 2006 (CST)

Given that Cylon agents and humans are genetically alike, and since cells degrade over time, it would follow that Cylons are capable of aging. After all, life is the quirk that keeps the meat fresh, as it were. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 09:24, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Not necessarily. Cylons are genetically engineered cyborgs. They might have been built to not age. Philwelch 13:57, 2 December 2006 (CST)

Indeed, though they are identical to the cellular level, at the molecular level they already start looking different, which leaves room for enough difference between their compositions to make everthing they do, and possibly lack of aging, possible. So it's a possibility that they do no age. --Sauron18 14:06, 2 December 2006 (CST)

Cavil "Atheist"

It seems in their conversation that they came to a fairly Agnostic, not atheist, conclusion with the line "can't prove it one way or another." Thought? --posted by Xavier101

No. Athiest. --The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 20:13, 28 May 2006 (CDT)

Could be either, but I'm leaning towards atheist. Philwelch 22:53, 27 June 2006 (CDT)

They acknowledged it couldn't be proven but stated that they personally believe there is no God, thus they are atheists. Noneofyourbusiness 11:34, 27 July 2006 (CDT)

Strictly speaking, a 'true' atheist denies the existence of a god or gods and does not concede the possibility that "we just don't know or can't prove it." An agnostic takes the position that we do not know or cannot prove it (presently), but often actually does have a basically atheistic outlook on the universe. My opinion is that, from a purely logical standpoint, Cavil's statements make him an agnostic with an atheistic outlook. Or, in other words, he would concede that he can't REALLY prove it one way or another, but would be willing to lay a substantial wager on the non-existence of god. --Felix Culpa 13:15, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

I think the fact that Cavil always used his hands to make quotation marks in the air each time he said "God" in "Occupation/Precipice" makes it far more likely that he's not at all on the same page as most of the other Cylons. Even undercover as a brother, he flat-out denies the concept. Perhaps more light will be shed in season 3. If a Cavil encounters Dodona Selloi, it would do just that. --Spencerian 15:37, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

You know, along the lines of not being on the same page as other Cylons...you remember that the various models of Cylon were having that discussion in Exodus Part I, and Cavil excused himself from the discussion, ostensibly because his input into it was unnecessary (if I recall correctly.) I interpreted that as Cavil essentially noting to the others that he is in disagreement as to fundamental courses of action with ALL of the other models present at the meeting. You get the same vibe? --Felix Culpa 20:01, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Atheism doesn't deny the existence of a god or gods, atheism is simply the lack of belief in a god or gods. You're thinking of "strong" or "positive atheism" Philwelch 01:32, 19 October 2006 (CDT)

That is one definition of the term 'atheism' to be sure, but its most common definition is indeed 'strong' atheism (as you have defined it), just as the most common definition of 'agnostic' implies lack of knowledge (or indeed, as a necessary consequence, a belief) as to same. Just what we mean by having a 'belief' is actually quite hard to define. But, at this point in the discussion, for purposes of probing Cavil's psyche, I think we are talking of distinctions without a difference. ;-) --Felix Culpa 17:52, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

Sleep Agent

Is Galactica Cavil a sleeper agent? I tend to think that he is because he seems to have a fake history and seems that sleepers tend defend themselves strongly when accused of being a cylon. Notice the difference betweem Galactica Cavil and Caprica Cavil in their responses to being accused. I know the Cylon Party comment does weaken the argument. Thoughts? --FrankieG 10:48, 26 June 2006 (CDT)

He wasn't a sleeper Agent as far as we know, in fact the easiness with which he "resumed" his Cylon status indicated that he was aware. The Caprican Cavil accepted it pretty quickly because eventually he planned to tell them, it was why he was there after all. The other Cavil still had his original mission to remain in secret. I take it sleepers normally don't respond well to the whole "Hey, you're a Cylon!" thing, which may be why boxing was invented, and was why Boomer had cuffs when she resurrected. --Sauron18 11:20 26 June 2006 (CDT)

In the continuity of the Miniseries novelization, Doral is a sleeper agent and he is discussed in great detail. His realization was like "flipping a switch." I know that doesn't mean much for the series, but I don't think that it is always a hard as Boomer found it. --FrankieG 11:45, 26 June 2006 (CDT)

I don't really think Cavil was a sleeper, because of how he acted with the Caprica copy. --BklynBruzer 18:51, 6 August 2006 (CDT)

Cavil and Caprica Six Revelations

I have a problem with the following statement: "They seem to have discovered many revelations that Caprica-Six realized through her "virtual" Baltar (Downloaded). Judging by this, the Cavil copies are probably among the first to flock to Caprica's banner." I think this amounts to pure speculation, and increasingly, bad speculation as we see that Cavil is (if anything) something of a general misanthrope. At any rate, I think there is no legitimate basis for concluding that Caprica Six and the Cavils share any particular insight or common viewpoint. Thoughts? --Felix Culpa 13:08, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Number Two?

Hey, someone pointed out to me that it was edited on wikipedia[1] that Cavil's number is "Two" and that it was apparently revealed through close cationing. I'm not sure if this is canon, but if someone can tell me more info on this...

I'm assuming it's a mistake, and that whoever posted it confused the close captioning in LDYBII, when it says "Cavil#2" (to differentiate Cavils) and assumed it meant that was his model number, but I do not know.--Sauron18 16:00, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

I think that is, as you suspected, an error in captioning context. As well, I don't think that Cavil will sit well with being known as "number two." He's a dark fellow, will nuke your house, put you in front of a firing squad. --Spencerian 16:14, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

Amen, brother. But he won't nuke your house, he'll only reduce your family down to a more manageable number, say 2. But that is only after he puts you down with his pesimistic superiority and complains about a headache. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Straycat0 (talk • contribs).

And it will be done to instill fear into the people's hearts and minds, because as he sees it, fear is a key article of faith. --BklynBruzer 21:03, 26 October 2006 (CDT)

Dean Stockwell said, in an interview, that he had been told he was number 2 --GMo >:M:< 21:52, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

No, what he said was -

"I turned out to be number three, Brother Cavil, of the significant seven."

My guess is he meant that he was the third Cylon revealed (since the mini) because the position of "number three" is already occupied. And he's not number 2, that was a mistake on someone, the captioning is not referring to that.--Sauron18 22:15, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

"Number Two: This is three downloads for me." that is the quote from the Captioning for Exodus Part I. I believe that the Evidence he is #2 has been presented. If it saying that on Sci-Fi Channel itself can't be counted as Canon what can? -- GMo >:M:< 22:35, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

Well, aside from the fact that my captions don't say that, it's still close captioning, which has proven unreliable before. We can't consider it canon unless revealed in some other manner in which we can be sure it's not a mistake. --Sauron18 22:49, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

Captions should be taken with a grain of salt, like the 54289/Viper 289 caption from Flight of the Phoenix. --Talos 23:22, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

Agreed. Captions when there is two or more people that are the same, usually have #1 and #2. This is an error. Repated edits to indicate Cavil as number two will be considered vandlism under the BW:EW policy. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 00:37, 28 October 2006 (CDT)

Can we all agree that it should be added to his page and the Cylon Page under notes with a link to this discussion page. Not everyone goes right to the Discussion pages. -- GMo >:M:< 10:47, 28 October 2006 (CDT)

Main Image

Hey, I have been thinking on Cavil's main image for a while, though I like the present one, I've been trying to find out perhaps new images that show him as looking more, I don't know, active or something, but I'm not sure. There are 3 candidates, including the current one, so what do you think.

Which of these is better as a main image?

Picture 1
Picture 2
Picture 3

Thank you for your opinions. --Sauron18 00:01, 19 December 2006 (CST)

2. --BklynBruzer 12:45, 19 December 2006 (CST)

Actually, I like the picture of the Executioner Cavil with the black hat in the article. Sadistic bastard he is, although 3 is OK. --Spencerian 12:55, 19 December 2006 (CST)

Ditto with Spenc. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 15:13, 19 December 2006 (CST)

@@ Line 111: / Line 111: @@
 :2. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 12:45, 19 December 2006 (CST)
 :Actually, I like the picture of the Executioner Cavil with the black hat in the article. Sadistic bastard he is, although 3 is OK. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:55, 19 December 2006 (CST)
+:Ditto with Spenc. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 15:13, 19 December 2006 (CST)