Talk:Gemenon Liner 1701/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
More actions
No edit summary |
m Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus" |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST) | :From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST) | ||
Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? Shouldn't it be "Gemenon Liners"? --[[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] | |||
:The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
::It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
== Merge Note == | |||
Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the [[Olympic Carrier]]), I recommend we merge this page with the [[Intersun Passenger Cruiser]] article. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
:I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
==Identity== | |||
I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
:I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:53, 11 April 2020
There is a partial picture in the Battlestar Galactica Magazine and it looks nothing like the Gemenon Traveller. I'll try to scan and upload the pic sometime tomorrow. --Ltcrashdown 23:49, 1 February 2006 (EST)
Citation
There's no citation for the main article. Does this happen in the mini-series? --Steelviper 13:44, 2 February 2006 (EST)
- From miniseries dialog, I got the impression that they abandoned this ship after evacuating it. --Ricimer 14:42, 2 February 2006 (EST)
Where is this "Gemon Liners" stuff coming from? Shouldn't it be "Gemenon Liners"? --Noneofyourbusiness
- The "Gemon" term is inaccurate. --Spencerian 12:42, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
- It's on the side of the CGI model, apparently. Make of it what you will. --April Arcus 16:03, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
Merge Note
Since all of these ships are the same model, and there is so little total data on them (except, of course, the Olympic Carrier), I recommend we merge this page with the Intersun Passenger Cruiser article. --Spencerian 12:43, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
- I disagree. The "Intersun Passenger Cruiser" is a dubiously canonical designation, coming only from the SciFi website. It's fair enough to cite it as trivia in the articles, but using it for the article title of several ships seems like too much. --April Arcus 15:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
Identity
I'm not at all sure this is the intersun vessel seen in that ship - the context of the scene suggests that the ship called Gemenon Liner 1701 is the Kimba Huta/Gemenon Traveler style ship seen approaching in the distance - perhaps Gemenon Liner 1701 is actually the formal designation of the ship otherwise referred to as Gemenon Traveler? --April Arcus 15:57, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
- I see that I had actually made note of this on the article itself, before those comments were recently deleted. I am reverting. --April Arcus 15:58, 9 May 2006 (CDT)