| Display title | Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Links Discretion |
| Default sort key | Think Tank/Links Discretion |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,879 |
| Namespace ID | 4 |
| Namespace | Battlestar_Wiki |
| Page ID | 10026 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
| Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
| Page creator | The Merovingian (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 20:24, 13 July 2006 |
| Latest editor | Catrope (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 07:51, 8 June 2007 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
| Transcluded templates (2) | Templates used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | I'm worried that over time, anyone who has a myspace page or minor one sheet website vaguely relating to Battlestar Galactica might try to add themselves to our Links section in the Community Portal. As many of you may remember, Spammers tried to add dozens of links to random sites from BattlestarWiki to get higher hit numbers: I see this as similar in a way; small fansites so tiny or inactive no one is using them, well I think BattlestarWiki is in a position to be taken advantage of. Therefore, I propose that we have a "cutoff point", that we will not simply list any and all websites that happen to have "BSG" scrawled in, say, but on a case by case basis review these links and decide whether they actually merit a link, by consensus. |
