The spelling of the mineral on the official SciFi.com website is "tyllium" (two Ls, not one). Should we correct here, move the page to a properly-spelled paged and redirect? Spencerian 11:26, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)
Perhaps it's the site that had a typo; otherwise, maybe we could sweep this one under the rug...---Ricimer 12:00, 19 Aug, 2005 EDT
- I tend to agree, unless there's a good reason, we should just have "tyllium" redirected to the original page. I haven't a clue how to do this. Spencerian 13:47, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)
- Leave a message on Joe's talk page. --Peter Farago 23:32, 19 Aug 2005 (EDT)
Move to Tylium (RDM)
As this article concerns the reimagined series, lets move it to reflect that... Kkimball 20:03, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
- No. The searches for "Tylium TOS" would be so uncommon it simply wouldn't be worth it. If you want maybe we could have "Tylium TOS" and "Tlyium", but "Tlyium RDM" would be too bulky, relative to the actual number of people searching for the other. --The Merovingian (C - E) 20:08, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
- Would we have anything interesting to say in "Tylium (TOS)"? --Peter Farago 21:04, 11 July 2006 (CDT)
Destroy all Tylium?
It is highly volatile; the explosion from a conventional warhead can trigger a chain reaction which will ultimately destroy all Tylium in the area.
I thought the reason the Colonials used a conventional warhead in "The Hand of God" was so that there would be a big enough explosion to take out the Cyclons and secondly, the Tylium would NOT be destroyed?--Veepz 17:14, 18 July 2007 (CDT)