Talk:Standoff Between Galactica and Pegasus/Archive 1
Discussion page of Standoff Between Galactica and Pegasus/Archive 1
Deletion Discussion
I can see Ricimer's arguement here. It wasn't so much a battle as it was a Mexican Standoff. I say delete. Joemc72 17:03, 19 January 2006 (EST)
- I haven't had access to a computer for the last few days, so I wasn't able to update this myself. You see ORIGINALLY, I thought they were going to shoot at each other...by which I mean, after I watched "Pegasus (episode)". I left "Galactica vs Pegasus" as a PLACEHOLDER NAME when I read reports that they were going to fight the Cylon Resurrection Ship without actually shooting at each other first, because I didn't want to add "Spoilers". Had I gotten here earlier would have simply deleted this Placeholder name entirely, and created the Battle of the Resurrection Ship page. I also have a long list on the talk page for "Battle of the Resurrection Ship" which I should really leave up as rules for future battles. Meanwhile, I would like to (in a fit of annoyance for a minute) say that I think it was a poorly planned idea to update the entire wiki with minor edits such as switching all the links to "William Adama", etc RIGHT AFTER a big site update like the last 2 week gap we had. You see, I'm not against this, but against the quantity of it; the "recent changes" button only records the last 500 things that have been changed, and doing several hundred link changes in rapid succession has made it impossible to easily reference changes made; this is important because many people like myself did not know when Battlestar Wiki was going to "reload", and now cannot easily see what has been changed. I don't mean to whine, sorry, but imagine yourself in my position; coming back with updates from an entiire new episode to make, and not having a full record of what has been happening for the past few days. Oh...I'll catch up over the weekend. I get bye. While I'm at it, I think I've going to change my screename soon to "The Merovingian"; it's the screename I use on all other galactica sites (official messageboard, Galactica Actual, Nicki Clyne fan site), and I really should have been using it since day 1 anyway. Be seeing you...--Ricimer17:38, 19 January 2006 (EST)
- I do not mind the existence of this page as viewers who see episode 10 (but not 11) are left thinking of imminent battle. I'll let consensus rule here and delete it after about a week if no opposition is made. --Spencerian 18:41, 19 January 2006 (EST)
- I'd prefer to keep it. By way of analogy, the Cold War was still a war, even if no shots were fired. --Peter Farago 20:12, 19 January 2006 (EST)
- Although Wikipedia is full of good ideas, we are not slaves to their conventions. Keep. --Peter Farago 22:38, 19 January 2006 (EST)
- Had I come here earlier, I would have removed this placeholder. If *nothing* is shot, it doesn't deserve a page; think about it; it's ENTIRipELY just stuff in "Resurrection Ship, Part I"--Ricimer, Ricimer 22:44, 19 January 2006 (EST)
- In the real world I am known for voicing my opinion (after serious contemplation), so I why not do so on the internet... There were no shots fired, there were no casualties... it was essentially a bunch of posturing. This does not constitute a battle. My vote is to: DELETE it! --cp.hayes 01:48, 21 January 2006 (EST)
- Because it's still a relevant conflict in the series, which very nearly boiled over into an armed confrontation. --Peter Farago 02:27, 21 January 2006 (EST)
- Galactica vs. Pegasus is a very important conflict in the series. Yes, it wasn't a battle, but could have very well disentegrated into one. Perhaps we should reclassify this page as a conflict rather than an actual battle... but deleting it is absurd, particularly since it is such a pivotal plot point. Also, to reply to your point regarding the minor edits made immediately after the update... you can always go through and select to hide all minor edits. -- Joe Beaudoin 09:27, 21 January 2006 (EST)
- I still believe that the place for this information is soley in the episode guide, not here. --Ricimer 13:46, 21 January 2006 (EST)
- I do not believe that this event should constitute a "battle" since, as others have pointed out, the situation was a standoff and did not evolve into a full conflict. I suggest deleting this article and combining the information into the Attack on the Resurrection Ship article. -- Nwobkwr 01:43, 22 January 2006 (EST)
- Those were not the same conflict. --Peter Farago 15:22, 22 January 2006 (EST)