Talk:Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1
Line 8: Line 8:


:Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
:Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
::Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long.  Shouldn't have deleted that.  On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:24, 23 May 2006

This was a tough page to build. There have been many references to the computers, and, given that RDM is against Technobabble, there's a limit on what is said to prevent limiting the growth of other stories. As we discover more about the inner computer workings, this should flesh out to be a nice page. (Cisco network engineers and MSCEs need not edit. I like to think that Galacticas more of a UNIX. :) --Spencerian 17:24, 21 October 2005 (EDT)

Merge/Splitting Off Computer History

Per Shane's markup: It's not a bad idea since I bet we'll have more to fill, although we may or may not need as much of a narrative such as what I had originally created. --Spencerian 15:38, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Merv, please let others chime in before removing a merge request. The article is long and such a new article shortens this one. I rolled back your removal of Shane's tag for this reason. --Spencerian 16:41, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --Peter Farago 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long. Shouldn't have deleted that. On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --The Merovingian (C - E) 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT)