Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Official Representation: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Official Representation
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus") |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I do not believe that any one person should "represent" BattlestarWiki, unless some sort of near-unanimous vote as Joe indicated directs otherwise, thus I agree strongly with this proposal. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:44, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | * {{support}} - I do not believe that any one person should "represent" BattlestarWiki, unless some sort of near-unanimous vote as Joe indicated directs otherwise, thus I agree strongly with this proposal. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 18:44, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{support}} No Brainier. Excellent Idea. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:53, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
* {{support}} clearly correct --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]]<sup>([[Special:Contributions/CalculatinAvatar|C]]-[[User talk:CalculatinAvatar|T]])</sup> 21:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
* {{support}} Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad/Archive2|anonymous sources debate]], and my [[Sources:Correspondence with Jim Iaccino|response]] to it, which itself necesitated an [[Battlestar_Wiki:Wikipedian_Quorum/Archive2#An_apology_regarding_spokesmanship|apology]] to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on [[Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules]], and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
:Indeed. I want to make sure we handle things like that better in the future; it's not like we had a system set up before. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 22:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
* {{support}} Should be common sense, but if this policy ensures that things are clarified then thats fine by me. --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 03:04, 9 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
* {{support}} So say we all. (Doh! Just broke the policy...) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 07:38, 9 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
* {{support}} By your comman--no, suggestion. (Sorry SV had to follow up ;-)) --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 11:36, 9 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
I'll give this until Sunday, August 13th for further discussion. If there are no objections during that time, then I'll roll this out after the 13th. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:30, 10 August 2006 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:54, 11 April 2020
Support - I do not believe that any one person should "represent" BattlestarWiki, unless some sort of near-unanimous vote as Joe indicated directs otherwise, thus I agree strongly with this proposal. --The Merovingian (C - E) 18:44, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support clearly correct --CalculatinAvatar(C-T) 21:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the anonymous sources debate, and my response to it, which itself necesitated an apology to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules, and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --April Arcus 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Indeed. I want to make sure we handle things like that better in the future; it's not like we had a system set up before. --The Merovingian (C - E) 22:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support Should be common sense, but if this policy ensures that things are clarified then thats fine by me. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:04, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support So say we all. (Doh! Just broke the policy...) --Steelviper 07:38, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
- Support By your comman--no, suggestion. (Sorry SV had to follow up ;-)) --FrankieG 11:36, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
I'll give this until Sunday, August 13th for further discussion. If there are no objections during that time, then I'll roll this out after the 13th. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:30, 10 August 2006 (CDT)