Talk:Colonial Defense Force/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Colonial Defense Force/Archive 1
More actions
+ 2 cents |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST) | :I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad|citations]]. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST) | :: As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:::Then it must be ''erradicated''.--[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 21:12, 30 January 2006
Is this an actual canonical name, or one we made up?--Ricimer 15:42, 30 January 2006 (EST)
- I concur that this name sounds shady, mostly due to its lack of citations. It'd be nice if we could confirm it, or if not at least indicate that this is a placeholder and not canonical. --Steelviper 15:52, 30 January 2006 (EST)
- As far as I know, it's non canonical. -- Joe Beaudoin 15:56, 30 January 2006 (EST)
- Then it must be erradicated.--Ricimer 16:12, 30 January 2006 (EST)