More actions
m Talk:O'Connell moved to Talk:McConnell |
Ltcrashdown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Shouldn't it just be <i>O'Connell</i>? None of the other ships in the fleet are listed with "the" in their article name. -- [[User:Kahran|Kahran]] 22:49, 27 January 2006 (EST) | : Shouldn't it just be <i>O'Connell</i>? None of the other ships in the fleet are listed with "the" in their article name. -- [[User:Kahran|Kahran]] 22:49, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::I suppose so. I just added the 'the' because that's how it's referred to in the episode. I'll make the change. Ltcrashdown 22:55, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ::I suppose so. I just added the 'the' because that's how it's referred to in the episode. I'll make the change. Ltcrashdown 22:55, 27 January 2006 (EST) | ||
Why was this changed to McConnell? It sounded like O'Connell in the episode, and it was the name of a Galactica producer. --Ltcrashdown 22:13, 28 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 03:13, 29 January 2006
Just so everyone knows, I created this page after hearing the name mentioned in Black Market. I could be wrong about the name, but it sounded like they meant that the O'Connell was one of the ships being vicitmized by Fisk. If anyone disagrees, feel free to post in response and we can hash it out. Ltcrashdown 22:41, 27 January 2006 (EST)
- Shouldn't it just be O'Connell? None of the other ships in the fleet are listed with "the" in their article name. -- Kahran 22:49, 27 January 2006 (EST)
- I suppose so. I just added the 'the' because that's how it's referred to in the episode. I'll make the change. Ltcrashdown 22:55, 27 January 2006 (EST)
Why was this changed to McConnell? It sounded like O'Connell in the episode, and it was the name of a Galactica producer. --Ltcrashdown 22:13, 28 January 2006 (EST)