I hope I didn't mess this up. |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
'''Support''' | '''Support''' | ||
# Is this where I say this? Anyway, I think Peter would be a good administrator chiefly because of the experience I had working out the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Standards and Conventions/Archive01#Proposed Guidelines for Dispute Resoluton on Speculative Matters|conflict resolution guidelines]] of [[Sacred Scrolls]]. I also often appriciate his edits of the material added by myself and others. He tends to cut out the excess verbage and get right to the point. --[[User:Day|Day]] 01:06, 21 December 2005 (EST) | # Is this where I say this? Anyway, I think Peter would be a good administrator chiefly because of the experience I had working out the [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Standards and Conventions/Archive01#Proposed Guidelines for Dispute Resoluton on Speculative Matters|conflict resolution guidelines]] of [[Sacred Scrolls]]. I also often appriciate his edits of the material added by myself and others. He tends to cut out the excess verbage and get right to the point. --[[User:Day|Day]] 01:06, 21 December 2005 (EST) | ||
# I support this nomination. Peter has a singular balance of administrative, editorial, and wikipedian savvy that may rival any other contributor. His work in creating (and defending the principles of) several key projects that have helped define this wiki into the work it has become has benefitted everyone. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:58, 21 December 2005 (EST) | |||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 21 December 2005
Peter Farago
{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} Vote here (0/0/0) ending 05:42 {{{Ending}}} (UTC)
Peter Farago (talk • contribs) – {{{Description}}}
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
- Is this where I say this? Anyway, I think Peter would be a good administrator chiefly because of the experience I had working out the conflict resolution guidelines of Sacred Scrolls. I also often appriciate his edits of the material added by myself and others. He tends to cut out the excess verbage and get right to the point. --Day 01:06, 21 December 2005 (EST)
- I support this nomination. Peter has a singular balance of administrative, editorial, and wikipedian savvy that may rival any other contributor. His work in creating (and defending the principles of) several key projects that have helped define this wiki into the work it has become has benefitted everyone. --Spencerian 08:58, 21 December 2005 (EST)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What duties, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Project Pages for a list of projects.
- A.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions here, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A.