Steelviper (talk | contribs) →[[Tom Zarek]]: it'll be good to have a new FA |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{comment}} I don't recall our stance on nominating articles on battles, but for all intents and purposes this is a very good article, and central to the series. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST) | {{comment}} I don't recall our stance on nominating articles on battles, but for all intents and purposes this is a very good article, and central to the series. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:{{comment}} There is [[Battle of the Resurrection Ship|precedent]]. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:29, 6 February 2008 (CST) | :{{comment}} There is [[Battle of the Resurrection Ship|precedent]]. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:29, 6 February 2008 (CST) | ||
::{{comment}} Ah, there it is... yes... yes... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 11:02, 6 February 2008 (CST) | |||
== [[Triton (RDM)]] == | == [[Triton (RDM)]] == | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 6 February 2008
Can't really think of anything really good that hasn't been nominated yet. But we could try again with some of the previous candidates. Virtual beings comes to mind. --Serenity 16:45, 8 January 2008 (CST)
- What about Razor? Seems to me that was mentioned last month but never pursued.--OrionFour 18:41, 8 January 2008 (CST)
- Suggestions of episode articles have typically been shot down, even though they're what initially drew me to the site. --Steelviper 10:44, 12 January 2008 (CST)
Tom Zarek
Comment I'll note that this is a very good article. My only objection right now is the succession boxes on the bottom, which are a bit annoying, IMHO. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
Support Very good character article. The succession box could be removed altogether. -- Serenity 12:56, 4 February 2008 (CST)- Support --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 13:07, 4 February 2008 (CST)
- Support What succession box? ;) --Steelviper 10:31, 6 February 2008 (CST)
Fall of the Twelve Colonies
Comment I don't recall our stance on nominating articles on battles, but for all intents and purposes this is a very good article, and central to the series. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
- Comment There is precedent. --Steelviper 10:29, 6 February 2008 (CST)
- Comment Ah, there it is... yes... yes... -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 11:02, 6 February 2008 (CST)
Triton (RDM)
- Comment A minutiae article, but one that is very detailed and exemplifies the breadth and depth of the Wiki. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
Oppose A very short article, it only just doesn't qualify for stub status, let alone FA. Of course that's because we know so little about it :D --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 13:08, 4 February 2008 (CST)
Sexuality in Battlestar Galactica (RDM)
Comment Define: in your face, sucka. <evil g> -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:50, 1 February 2008 (CST)
Galactica 1980
Comment A very detailed article on G80. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 22:50, 1 February 2008 (CST)