Talk:Valkyrie type battlestar/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Valkyrie type battlestar/Archive 1
(reply) |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: True. Everything here is repeated from other pages anyway, and we can always redirect this page to ''[[Valkyrie]]''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 07:19, 19 December 2007 (CST) | : True. Everything here is repeated from other pages anyway, and we can always redirect this page to ''[[Valkyrie]]''. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 07:19, 19 December 2007 (CST) | ||
:Concur. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 22:17, 19 December 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:17, 20 December 2007
I'd delete this entirely. I've thought about it, but what do we actually know about the class? Next to nothing. Everything relevant is already mentioned at Valkyrie with a link to Unnamed battlestars. The pictures here are repeats of other pages.
About the only known thing is that appears to be smaller that Galactica judging from the turret size, and thus might be an "escort battlestar". And that conclusion is already conjecture. --Serenity 03:10, 19 December 2007 (CST)
- True. Everything here is repeated from other pages anyway, and we can always redirect this page to Valkyrie. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 07:19, 19 December 2007 (CST)
- Concur. --Spencerian 22:17, 19 December 2007 (CST)