More actions
New page: == What's the difference? == There is discussion about this template on Template talk:Fandom. --~~~~ |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) +comment |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== What's the difference? == | == What's the difference? == | ||
There is discussion about this template on [[Template talk:Fandom]]. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST) | There is discussion about this template on [[Template talk:Fandom]]. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST) | ||
:On further review: The {{tl|non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{tl|separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{tl|fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as [[Frak party]], but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:47, 3 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:47, 3 August 2007
What's the difference?
There is discussion about this template on Template talk:Fandom. --Catrope 14:51, 4 March 2007 (CST)
- On further review: The {{non-canon}} template should be very rarely used (it could be considered, by a wiki vote, to mark all Galactica 1980 articles with this since that series is so unpopular). However, the {{separate continuity}} template fits the 1980 articles best. We've normally marked retcon material by notes and references in the central article, precluding the need for such a template. The {{fandom}} template is OK for popular sites such as Frak party, but is also a rarity since we aren't trying to document every fan site. This template is OK, but I don't know if non-canon is useful now. --Spencerian 14:47, 3 August 2007 (CDT)