Talk:Colonial Workers Alliance/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Colonial Workers Alliance/Archive 1
m (Talk:Workers Union moved to Talk:Colonial Worker's Alliance: Using canonical name from Dirty Hands)
(Move)
Line 6: Line 6:


::Great. I thought there was a name for it. Good cite. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:56, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
::Great. I thought there was a name for it. Good cite. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:56, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
== Move ==
Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:10, 7 June 2007

Name

Roslin: Oh I'm sorry. I thought you were engaged in collective bargaining o­n behalf of the Colonial Worker's Alliance. If that's not the case, then..

Should we move this to the name that Roslin called it? --Steelviper 13:26, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
Yeah, and maybe leave the redirect. Although grammatically it should be "Workers' Union" or something. With an apostrophe --Serenity 13:29, 18 April 2007 (CDT)
Great. I thought there was a name for it. Good cite. --Spencerian 14:56, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Move

Grammatically, the correct name is "Workers'" as opposed to "Worker's". The nitpicking brigade at your service. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 14:10, 7 June 2007 (CDT)