Battlestar Wiki:Quality Articles/New Caprican loco weed: Difference between revisions
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) (summary) |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) (→Suggestions: +bring on the funny) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Suggestions == | == Suggestions == | ||
'' | I'm a little torn about the notion that a non-sequitur page can be a quality page. However, perhaps looking at the quality of the article's purpose (that is, to make one laugh and poke fun at a canonical subject) is sufficient to merit a silly page as quality. This would allow silly pages to get some credit since they can't be Featured Articles. | ||
You realize, of course, that this page must be outstandingly funny as a result. I love what's in it now, but perhaps the pot-smoker references and stories can be improved just a tad. I think this is one of the funniest, but let's make it work to the point where it's just pee-in-your-pants hilarious. Maybe a bogus TOS reference to [[plant vapors]] would help (with [[Starbuck (TOS)|Starbuck]] being disappointed that his personal stash was confiscated or something). You get the idea. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:33, 22 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:33, 22 May 2007
| |||||
Summary
Wait, what? ... all joking aside, and aside from the fact that I wrote most of it, this article is a quality representation of a Silly page. See also: Spot the Cylon. JubalHarshaw 22:05, 21 May 2007 (CDT)
Suggestions
I'm a little torn about the notion that a non-sequitur page can be a quality page. However, perhaps looking at the quality of the article's purpose (that is, to make one laugh and poke fun at a canonical subject) is sufficient to merit a silly page as quality. This would allow silly pages to get some credit since they can't be Featured Articles.
You realize, of course, that this page must be outstandingly funny as a result. I love what's in it now, but perhaps the pot-smoker references and stories can be improved just a tad. I think this is one of the funniest, but let's make it work to the point where it's just pee-in-your-pants hilarious. Maybe a bogus TOS reference to plant vapors would help (with Starbuck being disappointed that his personal stash was confiscated or something). You get the idea. --Spencerian 08:33, 22 May 2007 (CDT)