April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::::That's reasonable. I've restored [[Cylon listening post]] to stand as an example while we discuss it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:04, 11 June 2006 (CDT) | ::::That's reasonable. I've restored [[Cylon listening post]] to stand as an example while we discuss it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 13:04, 11 June 2006 (CDT) | ||
=== Poll === | |||
{{vd}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 15:07, 23 June 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 20:07, 23 June 2006
Delete
This policy is not followed. We should just delete it. --Shane (T - C - E) 12:18, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
- With respect, I think you misunderstand the policy. --Peter Farago 12:19, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
- (Sorry if this is not the place) Not saying anyone is to blame, but this "knick-for-knack" is starting to get a little old. May I offer a solution? Shane, when you have an idea, create one example for the rest to discuss it (via the Quorum?). Peter, please don't revert the example until the rest can discuss it. I know that I am just a n00bie, but I think that we all can get along. Sorry if this should be somewhere else. --gougef 12:51, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
- I'm just following his princible argument in Template talk:Location Data. If something has no use, it should be deleted and the article should be on how people get their information. If there was no inovation allowed, this policy should be removed, revised according the Template talk:Location Data princible for deletion. --Shane (T - C - E) 12:54, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
- That's reasonable. I've restored Cylon listening post to stand as an example while we discuss it. --Peter Farago 13:04, 11 June 2006 (CDT)