Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Computers in the Re-imagined Series/Archive 1
Shane (talk | contribs)
Line 13: Line 13:
:::''Main article called [[Comupter History]]''
:::''Main article called [[Comupter History]]''
:::...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
:::...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
::::That sounds good. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:32, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 03:32, 24 May 2006

This was a tough page to build. There have been many references to the computers, and, given that RDM is against Technobabble, there's a limit on what is said to prevent limiting the growth of other stories. As we discover more about the inner computer workings, this should flesh out to be a nice page. (Cisco network engineers and MSCEs need not edit. I like to think that Galacticas more of a UNIX. :) --Spencerian 17:24, 21 October 2005 (EDT)

Merge/Splitting Off Computer History

Per Shane's markup: It's not a bad idea since I bet we'll have more to fill, although we may or may not need as much of a narrative such as what I had originally created. --Spencerian 15:38, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Merv, please let others chime in before removing a merge request. The article is long and such a new article shortens this one. I rolled back your removal of Shane's tag for this reason. --Spencerian 16:41, 23 May 2006 (CDT)

Not to defend Merv's hasty action, but I also think that a split would be more confusing than helpful. --Peter Farago 17:08, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
Sorry I was just looking through and on closer inspection you were right: this page has been getting kind of long. Shouldn't have deleted that. On the other hand I agree with Peter that it would get kind of confusing. --The Merovingian (C - E) 18:24, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
The secion is longer than the main part of computers itself. We could keep a paraphrased paragraph on the top having...
Main article called Comupter History
...so people would goto that page to read the full article. --Shane (T - C - E) 20:43, 23 May 2006 (CDT)
That sounds good. --Peter Farago 22:32, 23 May 2006 (CDT)