Talk:Orange passenger cruiser/Archive 1

Important Information Regard this Ship

Screencap provided:

Sagitarrian Spaceways Passenger Liner on Mini Series(1:48:46) © Zoic Studios

Sorry, this is a large image in size but i couldnt put it down any further without loosing detail. please read the notes on the image page.

This was taken at 1:48:46 on the mini series --Lgamser 07:27, 11 May 2006 (CDT)

new page for Sagitarrian Spaceways. what you guys think. can you add more info on this ship realting back to the other three models i have listed on the page - Lgamser--Lgamser 17:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

I'm sorry if I didn't know, but what's youre source for all of this passenger liner info? Some Zoic thing?--The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 08:32, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Thanks for the contribution. However, I concur with Merv. A source is required. Further, since there is so little information on these ships and because they are practically identical, this article should probably be merged with the Intersun Passenger Cruiser article. The only ship of this model that has been cited is the Olympic Carrier, which has its own separate page. Just let us know if your source. Also, Lgamser, you can sign your talk entries with four ~ (tildes). --Spencerian 10:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Not to pile on, but I agree with the above. Source or speedy delete. --Peter Farago 15:49, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

I did create this post to make some sense of how th hierchy of ships there are. Images of this ship HAVE BEEN produced by the Zioc Studios, and have have been a mockup ship to use in backgroud shots, apart from pan galactic and gemenon liner 1701. I was wanting to make the point where you have edited my page for intersun passanger liner, Intersun is the manufacture of ships (like in real world Boeing or Airbus), now then boeing license out the design to other shipliners out to the fleet (Pan galactic, Gemon Liners, and Saggittaron spaceways).

These liners are not the names of the ships, these are the shipliners of the the particular colony. these shipliners are like the real world Qantas, British Airlines, VirginBlue, etc. The intersun name is of importance because of its model. This is a STANDARD MODEL. and standard models are of the space configuration between shipliners who buy/make them from license from Intersun.

This is all i can assume. But if the Sagittaron Spaceways images didn't have any images of the ships (to verify its geniune) that was made by Zioc Studio for use in the Fleet, than i would totally agree with you by deleting this thread. But there are images of this ships, which there are (which i have produced), I see an importance of this ship. --Lgamser 17:36, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Another thing is that this spaceliner has been listed by someone other than myself in the The Fleet (RDM). So this is of some speculation. I can merely be seem of extending that name to a new page about the ship to prove with images of the ship that it does exist.--Lgamser 17:46, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Another thing is do a google search apon the ship, you will find that there is quite a lot of information on this ship on various sites.--Lgamser 17:47, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

I'm sorry but I cannot understand what you just said. Other sites? Can you give an example? Maybe you saw a fanfic and are mistaken. Where specifically did you hear the name "Sagitarrian Spaceways"?--The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 21:16, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

Correction: "Sagitaron Spaceways" was added to the Fleet list last month by Spencerian: can we have a screencap or something to confirm this? I'm confused. ---->I don't mean just for this, Lgamser, but where did you get the names for all of these other ships?--The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 21:19, 9 May 2006 (CDT)

I have put a screen cap on the actual article, unless someone has deleted those. I downloaded a 2.4mb bitmap of the ship but couldnt upload it. so i use a smaller version of the ship. This name "Sagitarrian Spaceways" is sighted on the ship across the top, like the Pan galactic and olympic carrier. I cant remember exactly where i got it from, but it must of have been a site http://rpg.bsgfandom.net/, and click on the fleet buttonand scroll down to sagitarrian liner. this site also displays pictures of the pan galactic and gemon liners.

That is of course on example. and what do you mean y other ships, all of the ships that i listed under Intersun Passenger Cruiser already exist, i was only putting them under a centrel article to reference, from its ship, as they all have the same body and look the same.--Lgamser 00:13, 10 May 2006 (CDT)

Also on the article it states that it is a PRESUMED ship of the fleet, presumed by the means of the images that have been provided. We can only presume that this ship DOES exist, only to the geniune image of it.

"Correction: "Sagitaron Spaceways" was added to the Fleet list last month by Spencerian." - on the ship it is spelt Sagitarrian Spaceways, even though Spencerian did get it wrong when he first added it to the fleet list.--Lgamser 00:22, 10 May 2006 (CDT)

I am sorry, but the link you provided to "rpj.bsgfandom.net", is for an online RPG game someone made. I don't think that many of the ship names in there are canonical in any way; you might want to re-evaluate whether they should be added into here. Thoughts by anyone else?--The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 00:56, 10 May 2006 (CDT)

I'd like to see the original Zoic source. This kind of recoloring work is very easy to do in photoshop. --Peter Farago 01:12, 10 May 2006 (CDT)

Article Deletion Imminent

I'm sorry, but the link and related information suggests that this article is fan fiction that comes from the Galactica RPG. This is not a canonical source, and I recommend we delete this article. I can find no mention of this spaceway in official sources. I will mark this page for deletion and will remove it within 24 hours unless a canonical source is identified. --Spencerian 10:10, 10 May 2006 (CDT)

What we would need would be a citation from an acceptable source, and I couldn't find anything (during a cursory search). If an acceptable source can be produced (within Spencerian's time guidelines) I would argue for its inclusion, otherwise it should probably go. --Steelviper 10:22, 10 May 2006 (CDT)