Talk:Spot the Cylon/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:13, 23 February 2006

This is brilliant. --Peter Farago 19:32, 21 February 2006 (EST)

I agree; a most appropriate silly page. A little formatting tweaks and it can join the annals of the Wiki. --Spencerian 21:38, 21 February 2006 (EST)

Actually, I think it's kind of redundant with our other Silly pages. I propose that it be deleted. As you know, it is my personal opinion that the place for such things in Uncylopedia. You promised, Spencerian, that our silly pages would be few in number. However, if consensus wants to keep it, I cannot stand in its way. --The Merovingian 01:03, 22 February 2006 (EST)

Let's do the consensus thing, please. I think it blends nicely with the existing pages. And my promise is really that of the collective purpose of this place. Entertaining outselves is a fringe benefit of the hard work we do throughout the wiki; thus, the silly pages. --Spencerian 19:33, 22 February 2006 (EST)

Let's keep it. It's pretty informative, aside from its silly brillance. -- Joe Beaudoin 21:13, 22 February 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 00:33, 23 February 2006 (view source) Spencerian (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:13, 23 February 2006 (view source) Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk \| contribs) (thoughts) Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:Let's do the consensus thing, please. I think it blends nicely with the existing pages. And my promise is really that of the collective purpose of this place. Entertaining outselves is a fringe benefit of the hard work we do throughout the wiki; thus, the silly pages. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:33, 22 February 2006 (EST)		:Let's do the consensus thing, please. I think it blends nicely with the existing pages. And my promise is really that of the collective purpose of this place. Entertaining outselves is a fringe benefit of the hard work we do throughout the wiki; thus, the silly pages. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 19:33, 22 February 2006 (EST)

			:: Let's keep it. It's pretty informative, aside from its silly brillance. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] 21:13, 22 February 2006 (EST)