More actions
New section: We use it, we don't use it... |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Sorry for my rapid change of mind regarding the production-readiness of [[Template:Podcast Data]]. After thinking about it for a minute, I concluded that the template is actually pretty production-ready. We shouldn't add it to each and every podcast page just yet, though, as we might wanna call a vote on it first. I'll add it to [[Podcast:Frak Party Q and A]] as a special podcast showcase. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:12, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | Sorry for my rapid change of mind regarding the production-readiness of [[Template:Podcast Data]]. After thinking about it for a minute, I concluded that the template is actually pretty production-ready. We shouldn't add it to each and every podcast page just yet, though, as we might wanna call a vote on it first. I'll add it to [[Podcast:Frak Party Q and A]] as a special podcast showcase. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 08:12, 28 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
:No problem. Though I don't see the need for a formal vote really, as it will likely pass easily. Maybe a section on the talk page asking for some final comments and opinions before implementation. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 09:08, 28 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 14:08, 28 September 2007
Archive...
I just noticed that those pages are not being archive. I am trying to figure it out. :) Shane (T - C - E) 19:34, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
- No problem. For now I can deal with it :)
- Btw, while you are at it, there is also an error on Talk:The Twelve Colonies (RDM) with some very old stuff still there. --Serenity 05:22, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
English English
Not typos, just not American English :P. I wont revert the changes back however. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:24, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- I didn't think about then, but just noticed it in my Firefox spell checker and "corrected" it :) Thinking about it, I know that it's not wrong, but we still prefer AE here. And I knew about "recognize/recognise", but didn't realize that "sceptical" is BE. That really looked wrong to me. --Serenity 06:39, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- Hmm, somehow 'sceptical' looks more logical to me than 'skeptical', but I guess that's because I'm Dutch and Serenity's German (many Dutch k's were changed to c's in the 1995 spelling revision). --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 08:47, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- Probably. It's written with 'k' here. Mhhh...I can actually see both, but languages don't make that much sense sometimes. German, English and Dutch all have common roots, but a lot of the details changed over the centuries. Anyways, this was just a result of me having an AE spell checker installed. I didn't edit the article because I noticed the "typos", but because of the series titles and while doing that I noticed the spell checker marking two words. Then I just wrote "typos" in the edit summary. --Serenity 08:59, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- We all know what you mean. Sometimes I get a little patriotic about British English thats all hehe. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 09:42, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- I know all about languages not making sense sometimes: try German declinations ;) --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 12:41, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- Das ist richtig. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 15:24, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, German grammar is weird sometimes. But so is French. French seems to have more irregular than regular verbs. --Serenity 16:16, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- True. German is one of the few languages that has rules for irregular verbs, makes life a little easier xD --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 16:44, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- I know all about languages not making sense sometimes: try German declinations ;) --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 12:41, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- We all know what you mean. Sometimes I get a little patriotic about British English thats all hehe. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 09:42, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- Probably. It's written with 'k' here. Mhhh...I can actually see both, but languages don't make that much sense sometimes. German, English and Dutch all have common roots, but a lot of the details changed over the centuries. Anyways, this was just a result of me having an AE spell checker installed. I didn't edit the article because I noticed the "typos", but because of the series titles and while doing that I noticed the spell checker marking two words. Then I just wrote "typos" in the edit summary. --Serenity 08:59, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
- Hmm, somehow 'sceptical' looks more logical to me than 'skeptical', but I guess that's because I'm Dutch and Serenity's German (many Dutch k's were changed to c's in the 1995 spelling revision). --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 08:47, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
We use it, we don't use it...
Sorry for my rapid change of mind regarding the production-readiness of Template:Podcast Data. After thinking about it for a minute, I concluded that the template is actually pretty production-ready. We shouldn't add it to each and every podcast page just yet, though, as we might wanna call a vote on it first. I'll add it to Podcast:Frak Party Q and A as a special podcast showcase. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 08:12, 28 September 2007 (CDT)
- No problem. Though I don't see the need for a formal vote really, as it will likely pass easily. Maybe a section on the talk page asking for some final comments and opinions before implementation. --Serenity 09:08, 28 September 2007 (CDT)