Template talk:Drugs: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:32, 8 January 2007

Loco weed classification

Dude, that loco weed is totally for medicinal purposes. I, like, have a doctor's note, or something. --Steelviper 13:09, 8 January 2007 (CST)

Yeah, right. For medicinal purposes. So, doc, should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --Spencerian 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST)

If we were going to do this... we need also

to keep everything "clean". Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST)

Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --Spencerian 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST)

I was thinking about that as I made this one, but wasn't sure if there were enough articles to warrant it. If consensus says yes, I'll go for it. JubalHarshaw 13:32, 8 January 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ::If we were going to do this... we need also {{Drugs (TOS)}} to keep everything "clean". [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST)
 :::Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST)
+::::I was thinking about that as I made this one, but wasn't sure if there were enough articles to warrant it. If consensus says yes, I'll go for it. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 13:32, 8 January 2007 (CST)