More actions
No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Yeah, right. ''For medicinal purposes.'' So, ''doc'', should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST) | :Yeah, right. ''For medicinal purposes.'' So, ''doc'', should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
::If we were going to do this... we need also {{Drugs (TOS)}} to keep everything "clean". [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ::If we were going to do this... we need also {{Drugs (TOS)}} to keep everything "clean". [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST) | ||
:::Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 19:27, 8 January 2007
Loco weed classification
Dude, that loco weed is totally for medicinal purposes. I, like, have a doctor's note, or something. --Steelviper 13:09, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Yeah, right. For medicinal purposes. So, doc, should we add all drugs to this new template, TOS and RDM? --Spencerian 13:19, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- If we were going to do this... we need also
to keep everything "clean". Shane (T - C - E) 13:20, 8 January 2007 (CST)
- Doesn't seem logical to do so; we'll have more to go from with RDM, and TOS is rather fixed in stone. Keep it as-is? --Spencerian 13:27, 8 January 2007 (CST)