Talk:Fan fiction/Battlestar GalactiSimpsons/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:05, 27 August 2007

Holy frak, these are too damn funny. While they aren't from an official source, the characterizations are spot-on. --Spencerian 12:34, 23 June 2006 (CDT)

Except Starbuck wearing a specialist uniform ;) --Mercifull 13:28, 23 June 2006 (CDT)

Er. didnt she wear one when she was dealing with the captured Cylon Raider with Cally and the Chief? --Fordsierra4x4 16:37, 23 June 2006 (CDT)

Yep. From Sources:Dylan Contact. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 16:46, 23 June 2006 (CDT)

Creative Commons?[edit]

I tried looking up the images, namely the allegation they were licensed under a Creative Commons license. However, I wasn't able to find this information... Perhaps someone could help me track this down? Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 23:37, 26 August 2007 (CDT)

They were originally posted LiveJournal: http://community.livejournal.com/pantsketch/99256.html

Not sure about the copyright, but since the creator was ok with it, I assumed everything was fine. --Serenity 06:09, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Well, there's no problem with keeping them on the wiki, since we have the creator's permission. However, the copyright bit concerns me, since we have no evidence to back it up. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 08:54, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Isn't it true only the copyright holder (in this case the creator) can sue us for using his image without permission? --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 12:43, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

I have talked with the creator. We have permission to host and use. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:49, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

There's some sort of misunderstanding here, I believe... I know we have the permission of the creator to use these images on the Wiki, and that's fine. My question lies in the allegation that these works are licensed under a Creative Commons license, which is not defined in the template -- and I certainly can't find anything supporting the Creative Commons claims. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 14:47, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Since it seems to be wrong, can't we just remove that tag and say we got permission? --Serenity 15:00, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Yes, that would be the logical course of action. ;-) -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 15:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :::Isn't it true only the copyright holder (in this case the creator) can sue us for using his image without permission? --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 12:43, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
 ::::I have talked with the creator. We have permission to host and use. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:49, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
+: There's some sort of misunderstanding here, I believe... I know we have the permission of the creator to use these images on the Wiki, and that's fine. My question lies in the allegation that these works are licensed under a Creative Commons license, which is not defined in the template -- and I certainly can't find anything supporting the Creative Commons claims. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 14:47, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
+::Since it seems to be wrong, can't we just remove that tag and say we got permission? --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:00, 27 August 2007 (CDT)
+:::Yes, that would be the logical course of action. ;-) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki &mdash; ''New'']</sup> 15:05, 27 August 2007 (CDT)