Talk:Commanding officer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Commanding officer/Archive 1
More actions
m Grammar fix |
m Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus" |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Delete== | ==Delete== | ||
Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User: | Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST) | ||
: Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST) | : Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::What he means is that it is redundant. I agree. This article isn't needed at all. --[[User:Ricimer|Ricimer]] 17:21, 20 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:38, 11 April 2020
Delete
Am I wrong, or is this article another "flashlight"? --April Arcus 17:15, 20 January 2006 (EST)
- Not sure if by 'flashlight' you mean 'stub that really can't be expanded on', but I was in the midst of questioning the need for this article, but you got there before me. :) Joemc72 17:17, 20 January 2006 (EST)
- What he means is that it is redundant. I agree. This article isn't needed at all. --Ricimer 17:21, 20 January 2006 (EST)