More actions
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Joe Beaudoin Jr. in topic Family tree
→Family tree: reply |
→Family tree: reply |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | Should [[Ruth]] and [[Gianne]] be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | : Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- [[User:Noneofyourbusiness|Noneofyourbusiness]] 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--[[User:Pedda|Pedda]] 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::: Given Ruth's growing importance in the series, particularly starting with "[[Gravedancing]]," I agree that she should be added. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 15:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:56, 24 February 2010
Family tree
Should Ruth and Gianne be added to the family tree? If we'd add Gianne's unborn child, too, the family tree would span five generations... wow... --Pedda 12:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Interesting point. I hadn't considered this, but I'd be inclined to add them. Quite the tree, I think. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 16:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- Noneofyourbusiness 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--Pedda 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Given Ruth's growing importance in the series, particularly starting with "Gravedancing," I agree that she should be added. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 15:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that adding Gianne, and her unborn child in particular, might be a little too much, but Ruth is an important character that's even featured in the main titles.--Pedda 15:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just make sure it can fit. I'm fine with the tree as is, given that Ruth is on the non-Adama side, Gianne never married Lee, and the child was never born. -- Noneofyourbusiness 00:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)