Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for Feburary 2008: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 03:19, 20 November 2009

Can't really think of anything really good that hasn't been nominated yet. But we could try again with some of the previous candidates. Virtual beings comes to mind. --Serenity 16:45, 8 January 2008 (CST)

What about Razor? Seems to me that was mentioned last month but never pursued.--OrionFour 18:41, 8 January 2008 (CST)

Suggestions of episode articles have typically been shot down, even though they're what initially drew me to the site. --Steelviper 10:44, 12 January 2008 (CST)

Tom Zarek

Comment I'll note that this is a very good article. My only objection right now is the succession boxes on the bottom, which are a bit annoying, IMHO. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus} 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
Support Very good character article. The succession box could be removed altogether. -- Serenity 12:56, 4 February 2008 (CST)
Support --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 13:07, 4 February 2008 (CST)
Support What succession box? ;) --Steelviper 10:31, 6 February 2008 (CST)

Fall of the Twelve Colonies

Comment I don't recall our stance on nominating articles on battles, but for all intents and purposes this is a very good article, and central to the series. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus} 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)

Comment There is precedent. --Steelviper 10:29, 6 February 2008 (CST)

Comment Ah, there it is... yes... yes... -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus} 11:02, 6 February 2008 (CST)

Triton (RDM)

Comment A minutiae article, but one that is very detailed and exemplifies the breadth and depth of the Wiki. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus} 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
Oppose A very short article, it only just doesn't qualify for stub status, let alone FA. Of course that's because we know so little about it :D --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 13:08, 4 February 2008 (CST)

Sexuality in Battlestar Galactica (RDM)

Comment Define: in your face, sucka. <evil g> -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus} 22:50, 1 February 2008 (CST)

Galactica 1980

Comment A very detailed article on G80. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus} 22:50, 1 February 2008 (CST)

Support Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:49, 4 February 2008 (CST)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 == [[Tom Zarek]] ==
-{{comment}} I'll note that this is a very good article. My only objection right now is the succession boxes on the bottom, which are a bit annoying, IMHO. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
+*{{comment}} I'll note that this is a very good article. My only objection right now is the succession boxes on the bottom, which are a bit annoying, IMHO. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
+*{{support}} Very good character article. The succession box could be removed altogether. -- [[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 12:56, 4 February 2008 (CST)
+*{{support}} --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 13:07, 4 February 2008 (CST)
+*{{support}} What succession box? ;) --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:31, 6 February 2008 (CST)
 == [[Fall of the Twelve Colonies]] ==
 {{comment}} I don't recall our stance on nominating articles on battles, but for all intents and purposes this is a very good article, and central to the series. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
+:{{comment}} There is [[Battle of the Resurrection Ship|precedent]]. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:29, 6 February 2008 (CST)
+::{{comment}} Ah, there it is... yes... yes... -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 11:02, 6 February 2008 (CST)
 == [[Triton (RDM)]] ==
-{{comment}} A minutiae article, but one that is very detailed and exemplifies the breadth and depth of the Wiki. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
+*{{comment}} A minutiae article, but one that is very detailed and exemplifies the breadth and depth of the Wiki. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:43, 1 February 2008 (CST)
+*{{oppose}} A very short article, it only just doesn't qualify for stub status, let alone FA. Of course that's because we know so little about it :D --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]]<sup>([[User talk:Catrope|Talk to me]] or [[Special:Emailuser/Catrope|e-mail me]])</sup> 13:08, 4 February 2008 (CST)
 == [[Sexuality in Battlestar Galactica (RDM)]] ==
@@ Line 22: / Line 28: @@
 {{comment}} A very detailed article on G80. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 22:50, 1 February 2008 (CST)
+{{support}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 12:49, 4 February 2008 (CST)