Talk:Battle of Cimtar/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:35, 16 December 2005

Pearl Harbor Reference, and other ?'s

Is the Pearl Harbor Reference really all that appropriate? Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack against an unsuspecting stationary garrison. The Battle of Cimtar was more of a trap/ambush that lured the Colonial fleet into one spot, allowing the Basestars to do an end-around and wipe out the colonies. I was also unsure of the formatting (how many "="'s to use), and the tense, so I tried to leave them as close to the original as possible. Also, if anybody knows of a more appropriate picture for the battle template, I'd welcome it. I just grabbed the first picture of the old Galactica I could find here. --Steelviper 16:27, 15 December 2005 (EST)

Looks good. Glad you took in Ricimer's battle page template; it will work great for the TOS battles (and there are a lot of them). I don't see the need of the Pearl Harbor reference, either, same criteria. Later someone with a DVD copy can get more than few good screenshots to place here; I think the battlestar there is a suitable placeholder. I'd stick with the header conventions that we use in the RDM pages to be a guide. --Spencerian 17:01, 15 December 2005 (EST)

Since there was no battle of Cimtar in the RDM universe, I don't think this page needs to be namespaced. --Peter Farago 19:35, 15 December 2005 (EST)

Revision as of 22:01, 15 December 2005 (view source) Spencerian (talk \| contribs) (→‎Pearl Harbor Reference, and other ?'s) ← Older edit		Revision as of 00:35, 16 December 2005 (view source) April Arcus (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:Looks good. Glad you took in Ricimer's battle page template; it will work great for the TOS battles (and there are a lot of them). I don't see the need of the Pearl Harbor reference, either, same criteria. Later someone with a DVD copy can get more than few good screenshots to place here; I think the battlestar there is a suitable placeholder. I'd stick with the header conventions that we use in the RDM pages to be a guide. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:01, 15 December 2005 (EST)		:Looks good. Glad you took in Ricimer's battle page template; it will work great for the TOS battles (and there are a lot of them). I don't see the need of the Pearl Harbor reference, either, same criteria. Later someone with a DVD copy can get more than few good screenshots to place here; I think the battlestar there is a suitable placeholder. I'd stick with the header conventions that we use in the RDM pages to be a guide. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 17:01, 15 December 2005 (EST)

			::Since there was no battle of Cimtar in the RDM universe, I don't think this page needs to be namespaced. --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 19:35, 15 December 2005 (EST)