Display title | Talk:Battle of Cimtar/Archive 1 |
Default sort key | Battle of Cimtar/Archive 1 |
Page length (in bytes) | 3,469 |
Namespace ID | 1 |
Namespace | Talk |
Page ID | 4160 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | Allow all users (infinite) |
Move | Allow all users (infinite) |
Page creator | Steelviper (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 21:27, 15 December 2005 |
Latest editor | Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 01:40, 11 April 2020 |
Total number of edits | 12 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Is the Pearl Harbor Reference really all that appropriate? Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack against an unsuspecting stationary garrison. The Battle of Cimtar was more of a trap/ambush that lured the Colonial fleet into one spot, allowing the Basestars to do an end-around and wipe out the colonies. I was also unsure of the formatting (how many "="'s to use), and the tense, so I tried to leave them as close to the original as possible. Also, if anybody knows of a more appropriate picture for the battle template, I'd welcome it. I just grabbed the first picture of the old Galactica I could find here. --Steelviper 16:27, 15 December 2005 (EST) |