Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Information for "Talk:Battle of Cimtar/Archive 1"

Discussion page of Battle of Cimtar/Archive 1

Basic information

Display titleTalk:Battle of Cimtar/Archive 1
Default sort keyBattle of Cimtar/Archive 1
Page length (in bytes)3,469
Namespace ID1
NamespaceTalk
Page ID4160
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorSteelviper (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation21:27, 15 December 2005
Latest editorJoe Beaudoin Jr. (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit01:40, 11 April 2020
Total number of edits12
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

SEO properties

Description

Content

Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Is the Pearl Harbor Reference really all that appropriate? Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack against an unsuspecting stationary garrison. The Battle of Cimtar was more of a trap/ambush that lured the Colonial fleet into one spot, allowing the Basestars to do an end-around and wipe out the colonies. I was also unsure of the formatting (how many "="'s to use), and the tense, so I tried to leave them as close to the original as possible. Also, if anybody knows of a more appropriate picture for the battle template, I'd welcome it. I just grabbed the first picture of the old Galactica I could find here. --Steelviper 16:27, 15 December 2005 (EST)
Information from Extension:WikiSEO