Talk:Armistice Officer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Armistice Officer/Archive 1
(sexual assault?) |
m (Text replacement - "Peter Farago" to "April Arcus") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User: | In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST) | ||
:Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST) | :Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Sexual Assault== | ==Sexual Assault== | ||
:''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"'' | :''In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"'' | ||
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User: | I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --[[User:April Arcus|April Arcus]] 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT) | :Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:45, 11 April 2020
In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --April Arcus 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)
- Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --Spencerian 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)
Sexual Assault
- In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --April Arcus 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)
- Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --Spencerian 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
- Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --CalculatinAvatar 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
- Frankly, I can't think that there was time to DO anything, but getting the kiss of death is sufficient... --Spencerian 08:41, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
- It was a sexual assault -- the guy didn't really object, but he was understandably scared out of his wits. But the problem is that "sexual assault" is a legal term that covers a very broad range of actions. I've replaced it with a straight description of events. Maybe "forcibly kisses" is kind of an odd turn of phrase, but it is more specifically descriprive. --Evan 17:43, 6 July 2006 (CDT)