Talk:Viper 2220 (Mark VII)/Archive 1

Merge

One is a Mk II, while the other is a Mk VII. Hence they can't be the same. I'd say we keep the two pages separate. --Serenity 15:41, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

I (obviously) agree, since I was the one who happened upon this peculiar discovery... -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 16:05, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

Playing devil's advocate, I should mention the Viper 7961 article, since it's another of the reused numbers. --Talos 16:48, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

We can split that article as well, since they are on two different subjects. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 16:50, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

Aye, I agree, just wanted to see your thoughts on it. --Talos 19:31, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

Sure, not a problem, Talos. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 20:20, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

Sorry about that, I mixed up Viper 2220 and Viper 220, the latter of which is a Mark VII. --Catrope^{(Talk to me or e-mail me)} 07:27, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

No worries. :-) -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New} 20:20, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

Anyone notice that in the bit in He That Believeth In Me where we get a close enough look at this Viper to see the back of the cockpit it changes the original version of the Mark VII(Note the different colour of the hull and the sleeker contours), but when we see it in battle it reverts to the Maelstrom-onward version? ZeldaTheSwordsman 02:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)