More actions
Needed?
Vote will end on 23 October 2006 at 12:00 UTC. If you have not voted already, please vote or comment. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)
Delete The {{Battle Data}} template has the cronology. I really don't see a point to this template. Comments? --Shane (T - C - E) 21:30, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
- bump to get comments
Delete I honestly do not see the need for it, either. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 21:41, 8 October 2006 (CDT)
- Delete Agree. Down with template clutter. --Peter Farago 02:05, 9 October 2006 (CDT)
- Delete While episode data also contains a chronology redundant with the episode list template, that's a far more core/critical article series. I don't know how most people navigate the battles, but there are currently few enough (even across three seasons) that it doesn't seem like an undue burden to scroll through them chronologically, or just to click on the Colonial Battles (RDM) category if you want to view them all at once. --Steelviper 09:24, 9 October 2006 (CDT)
Keep I personally think it works quite well, give great ease of navigation and doesnt clutter the page. I'm not too bothered either way but I thought id just put my view across. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 11:17, 9 October 2006 (CDT)- Delete. I prefer the K.I.S.S. principle here; the original template works fine and leaves one less thing to edit. --Spencerian 11:24, 9 October 2006 (CDT)
- Keep The battles of the Cylon War are significant and numerous enough to warrant a template like this. The template people to access the different articles on each. -- Troyian 17:52, 10 October 2006 (CDT)
- Maybe if placed on articles that arn't the battle pages, but otherwise it's always going to be directly below the very large {{Battle Data}} template. --Shane (T - C - E) 02:19, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
- What other pages would this thing go on? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 13:21, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
- Keep I like it becuase episode pages dont tell me details of the battles and these do and i like too look up stuff about them and the battk\le pages keep it way easy-Snorkel378
Deletion
Vote stood at 5-3 as of 23 October. Do we have consensus for deletion? --Peter Farago 02:35, 17 December 2006 (CST)
- Not really... Shane (T - C - E) 10:34, 17 December 2006 (CST)
- 62% for deletion isn't consensus, unless we want to redo the vote. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:16, 17 December 2006 (CST)