MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice

Style Update
In Progress

Styles and CSS tags are in the process of being updated, and should be completed by the end of 21 August 2006. When registering a user (either here or at media.battlestarwiki.org), highlight the white section to reveal the text (and the captcha).

Blank or Change?

The DNS stuff should be well past, now. Should we blank the sitenotice, or change it to something else? --Steelviper 12:58, 9 November 2006 (CST)

BW:FA and BW:FP notice. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 13:51, 9 November 2006 (CST)

Pimp my store?

Wasn't sure what to replace the sitenotice with, so I blanked it for now. Maybe a quick link pointing people to the new Amazon store? --Steelviper 16:13, 12 November 2006 (CST)

Honestly, I would really want to let people know about the policy concerning the "Questions" sections of episode guides. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 16:21, 12 November 2006 (CST)

I was going to do a quick "By your command" and just link to BW:FORUM, but I noticed (unfortunately) when I checked the link that nothing was there yet. I gave it a quick start, but I figured our resident wordsmiths (especially Spence) might want to have a go at it before I link to it at the top. Of course, having it on the sitenotice would certainly get people through to it in order to see it and read about it/make corrections. Let me know if you still want me to link the sitenotice to it yet, or not. --Steelviper 18:26, 12 November 2006 (CST)

Heh. Actually, had I not fallen asleep, I would have already busted out BW:FORUM. :-) I'm going through it now, but it looks very good, and is in line with the idea previously dunked into the tank. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 10:03, 13 November 2006 (CST)

Ok, I'm done with what I wanted to do with it. Once Spence has gone through it, it should be ready to roll and kick some Cylon ass. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 11:14, 13 November 2006 (CST)

Update done. I added one item that might be useful (or not): Given that we had some contributors who repeatedly done this, we should warn them a few times and then remove their editing priveleges (though not ban) the contributor to see how things go. The other edits should be self-explanatory. --Spencerian 16:46, 14 November 2006 (CST)