Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006

Archive - Between October 2, 2006 and October 8, 2006

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game

Oppose. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --Peter Farago 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose I nominated it only as a joke. --BklynBruzer 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose I agree with Peter about it needed a decent cleanup --Mercifull ^{(Talk/Contribs)} 03:29, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Comment - could use some information currently hosted in Cylon Models. --Peter Farago 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Comment: I love the theory here. Blows warp drive out of the water. But... --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --Peter Farago 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --Serenity 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose as well. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 20:30, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Support --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 20:32, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support A good article about possibly the most important character in the show. --BklynBruzer 21:04, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support. That is a good one, and we've been techno-heavy lately. Vote's changed. --Spencerian 23:01, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support --Mercifull ^{(Talk/Contribs)} 03:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT)