Categories for Technology
Were we dividing the Technology and Terminology categories to separate TOS and RDM areas? In the past we had only one classification. --Spencerian 14:04, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- Actually, I just threw that cat in there without thinking about it. So, right now, the answer is "no", unless there are objectors to keeping these categories "as is". -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 14:25, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- I'd move that we keep the technologies (TOS) and add technologies. That'd seem to be in keeping with the model laid out in the talk of Battlestar Wiki:Categories, whereby one would be able to either view "all technology", or just view the technology of the particular series. --Steelviper 14:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- Basically, we should have a general category Category:Technology, with sub categories to Category:Technology (RDM) and Category:Technology (TOS)? Or just tag pages with both the general technology cat and then the specific technology series cat? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 14:35, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- I'd move that we keep the technologies (TOS) and add technologies. That'd seem to be in keeping with the model laid out in the talk of Battlestar Wiki:Categories, whereby one would be able to either view "all technology", or just view the technology of the particular series. --Steelviper 14:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)