Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:28, 3 October 2006

Oppose. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --Peter Farago 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose I nominated it only as a joke. --BklynBruzer 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Comment - could use some information currently hosted in Cylon Models. --Peter Farago 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Comment: I love the theory here. Blows warp drive out of the water. But... --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --Peter Farago 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --Serenity 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Oppose as well. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 20:30, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

Support --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 20:32, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support A good article about possibly the most important character in the show. --BklynBruzer 21:04, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support. That is a good one, and we've been techno-heavy lately. Vote's changed. --Spencerian 23:01, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Support --Mercifull ^{(Talk/Contribs)} 03:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 * {{support}} A good article about possibly the most important character in the show. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 21:04, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
 * {{support}}. That is a good one, and we've been techno-heavy lately. Vote's changed. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 23:01, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
+* {{support}} --[[User:Mercifull|Mercifull]] <sup>([[User talk:Mercifull|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Mercifull|Contribs]])</sup> 03:28, 3 October 2006 (CDT)