Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
BklynBruzer (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* {{oppose}}. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}}. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | * {{oppose}} --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
* {{oppose}} I nominated it only as a joke. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | |||
== [[Cylon agent]] == | == [[Cylon agent]] == | ||
*Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | *Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 02:03, 3 October 2006
The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game
- Oppose. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --Peter Farago 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose --Shane (T - C - E) 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose I nominated it only as a joke. --BklynBruzer 21:03, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Cylon agent
- Comment - could use some information currently hosted in Cylon Models. --Peter Farago 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
FTL
- Support. I love the theory here. Blows warp drive out of the water. Gets my vote. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --Peter Farago 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Support. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --Serenity 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose. I see Peter's point about this article not necessarily being representative of this being a character-driven show. At the same time, however, the article is well written and could be a featured article. The major weakness in this article is the lack of verifiable sources, particularly the notes on its feasibility and the Kip Thorne/Carl Sagan items in the article. The only reference to these items are Wikipedia, a resource that should never be used as either primary or secondary source of information. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 20:07, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose as well. --Shane (T - C - E) 20:30, 2 October 2006 (CDT)