Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for October 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
→[[Cylon agent]]: comment |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== [[Cylon agent]] == | == [[Cylon agent]] == | ||
*Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | *Comment - could use some information currently hosted in [[Cylon Models]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
*Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT) | |||
== [[FTL]] == | == [[FTL]] == | ||
Revision as of 00:59, 3 October 2006
The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game
Oppose. Funny, but inconsistent. Also, a silly page has to be exceedingly silly to overshadow a non-silly page, in my opinion. Close, though. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)- Oppose. As the original creator, I feel that the drinking game is in drastic need of revision. --Peter Farago 18:13, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Oppose --Shane (T - C - E) 18:27, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
Cylon agent
- Comment - could use some information currently hosted in Cylon Models. --Peter Farago 19:40, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Comment - I believe it could stand to be revised. I'm not entirely sure whether or not we should be including information on Isis/Hera in there either, despite the "Nubmer Thirteen" statement Gina made to Biers' in a deleted scene. -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 19:59, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
FTL
Support. I love the theory here. Blows warp drive out of the water. Gets my vote. --Spencerian 16:11, 2 October 2006 (CDT)- Oppose. An article focusing on technobabble is not representative of this character-driven show. --Peter Farago 18:14, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
- Support. I generally don't like extensive discussions of made-up technology, but it's a well written article. --Serenity 18:21, 2 October 2006 (CDT)
