More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) suggestion |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
: Actually, I just threw that cat in there without thinking about it. So, right now, the answer is "no", unless there are objectors to keeping these categories "as is". -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 14:25, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | : Actually, I just threw that cat in there without thinking about it. So, right now, the answer is "no", unless there are objectors to keeping these categories "as is". -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 14:25, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
::I'd move that we keep the technologies (TOS) and add technologies. That'd seem to be in keeping with the model laid out in the talk of [[Battlestar Wiki:Categories]], whereby one would be able to either view "all technology", or just view the technology of the particular series. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | ::I'd move that we keep the technologies (TOS) and add technologies. That'd seem to be in keeping with the model laid out in the talk of [[Battlestar Wiki:Categories]], whereby one would be able to either view "all technology", or just view the technology of the particular series. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | ||
:::Basically, we should have a general category [[:Category:Technology]], with sub categories to [[:Category:Technology (RDM)]] and [[:Category:Technology (TOS)]]? Or just tag pages with both the general technology cat and then the specific technology series cat? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 14:35, 11 September 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:35, 11 September 2006
Categories for Technology
Were we dividing the Technology and Terminology categories to separate TOS and RDM areas? In the past we had only one classification. --Spencerian 14:04, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- Actually, I just threw that cat in there without thinking about it. So, right now, the answer is "no", unless there are objectors to keeping these categories "as is". -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 14:25, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- I'd move that we keep the technologies (TOS) and add technologies. That'd seem to be in keeping with the model laid out in the talk of Battlestar Wiki:Categories, whereby one would be able to either view "all technology", or just view the technology of the particular series. --Steelviper 14:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- Basically, we should have a general category Category:Technology, with sub categories to Category:Technology (RDM) and Category:Technology (TOS)? Or just tag pages with both the general technology cat and then the specific technology series cat? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 14:35, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
- I'd move that we keep the technologies (TOS) and add technologies. That'd seem to be in keeping with the model laid out in the talk of Battlestar Wiki:Categories, whereby one would be able to either view "all technology", or just view the technology of the particular series. --Steelviper 14:29, 11 September 2006 (CDT)