Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Official Representation

• Support - I do not believe that any one person should "represent" BattlestarWiki, unless some sort of near-unanimous vote as Joe indicated directs otherwise, thus I agree strongly with this proposal. --The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 18:44, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

• Support No Brainier. Excellent Idea. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 18:53, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

• Support clearly correct --CalculatinAvatar^(C-T) 21:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

• Support Having a procedure will help with issues such as the off-wiki reaction to the anonymous sources debate, and my response to it, which itself necesitated an apology to the wiki. The proposed policy corresponds with the opinion I expressed earlier on Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules, and I have no objection to Joe's proposed exceptions. --Peter Farago 22:07, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

Indeed. I want to make sure we handle things like that better in the future; it's not like we had a system set up before. --The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 22:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

• Support Should be common sense, but if this policy ensures that things are clarified then thats fine by me. --Mercifull ^{(Talk/Contribs)} 03:04, 9 August 2006 (CDT)

• Support So say we all. (Doh! Just broke the policy...) --Steelviper 07:38, 9 August 2006 (CDT)

• Support By your comman--no, suggestion. (Sorry SV had to follow up ;-)) --FrankieG 11:36, 9 August 2006 (CDT)