Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT) | :Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 18:24, 24 April 2006
In the miniseries, Gaeta refers to him as the "courier officer". Should we move the page, or is the current title more obvious? --Peter Farago 16:30, 8 December 2005 (EST)
- Since he hasn't a name, I just updated the page with that information. If we really don't have to move a page, we shouldn't, at least for a character that we will never gain more info about. I'll have a redirect page set for "Courier officer". --Spencerian 13:17, 13 December 2005 (EST)
Sexual Assault[edit]
- In an edit summary, CalculatinAvatar muses: "ponder changing "sexually assaults" but come up short"
I think the wording is good. We certainly wouldn't have a problem with it if the genders were reversed. --Peter Farago 19:34, 22 April 2006 (CDT)
- Concur here. Six is forcing the officer to kiss her, preventing his escape. I think that's sexual assault in its basic form. --Spencerian 13:01, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
- Well, my thought was that such wording implies it went further than it did, but, as mentioned, I couldn't think of anything better. --CalculatinAvatar 13:24, 24 April 2006 (CDT)