Spencerian (talk | contribs) Page move and updating in progress |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''For archived | ''For archived discussions prior to January 23, 2006, [http://www.battlestarwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Talk:Humano-Cylon&oldid=26309 click here.] | ||
== Replacement and retirement of article title == | == Replacement and retirement of article title == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
''This discussion's origin originated in [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Standards and Conventions#Replacement and retirement of the term "Humano-Cylon"|the Standards and Conventions talk page]], where you can find the original content.'' | ''This discussion's origin originated in [[Battlestar Wiki talk:Standards and Conventions#Replacement and retirement of the term "Humano-Cylon"|the Standards and Conventions talk page]], where you can find the original content.'' | ||
I plan to move this article to [[Cylon agent]], as it is the most commonly used term to describe the humanoid Cylon models. "Humano-Cylon" will redirect here. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:58, 14 February 2006 (EST) | Per the discussion in the above link, I plan to move this article to [[Cylon agent]], as it is the most commonly used term to describe the humanoid Cylon models. "Humano-Cylon" will redirect here, and we will need to scour for other terms to redirect as well. This name is sufficiently canonical that it is unlikely that further debate is required. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:58, 14 February 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 14 February 2006
For archived discussions prior to January 23, 2006, click here.
Replacement and retirement of article title
This discussion's origin originated in the Standards and Conventions talk page, where you can find the original content.
Per the discussion in the above link, I plan to move this article to Cylon agent, as it is the most commonly used term to describe the humanoid Cylon models. "Humano-Cylon" will redirect here, and we will need to scour for other terms to redirect as well. This name is sufficiently canonical that it is unlikely that further debate is required. --Spencerian 14:58, 14 February 2006 (EST)