File talk:Lowdownbootcamp.jpg: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of File:Lowdownbootcamp.jpg
More actions
question regarding quality of image |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Did this image come from the DVD or from a lower quality source? -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 11:34, 30 January 2006 (EST) | Did this image come from the DVD or from a lower quality source? -- [[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 11:34, 30 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:It came from the DVD. Unfortunately and paradoxically my Mac's screen capture is limited in quality thanks to Apple's disabling of direct screen capture. I may be able to capture this in another mode, so will try later. The quality of the image was not great to start. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 11:54, 30 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 16:54, 30 January 2006
Position of Attention
I think Katee's picture from here might be in the dictionary next to "Ramrod". There seems to be a little variation between some very formal/rigid postures vs. some of them looking pretty relaxed. Nitpicker note: What's up with the sleeves? Are we sleeves up, or sleeves down today? (Whatever feels comfortable to the individual isn't very "uniform".) In ROTC we rarely got to roll sleeves as EVERYONE would have to do it, and that's quite a time consuming undertaking at the company level (especially with people not accustomed to sleeve-rolling). --Steelviper 11:32, 30 January 2006 (EST)
Did this come from the DVD?
Did this image come from the DVD or from a lower quality source? -- Joe Beaudoin 11:34, 30 January 2006 (EST)
- It came from the DVD. Unfortunately and paradoxically my Mac's screen capture is limited in quality thanks to Apple's disabling of direct screen capture. I may be able to capture this in another mode, so will try later. The quality of the image was not great to start. --Spencerian 11:54, 30 January 2006 (EST)
